AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NO: 98- 00483
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that he be awarded the Presidential Unit
Citation and the Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM)
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request
and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is attached at
Exhibit E.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on
the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by
applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no
basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request i s denied.
The Board staff is'directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board, Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. William E.
Edwards, and Mr. Robert W. Zook considered this application on
1 October 1998, in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and the governing statute, 1 0 U.S.C. 1 5 5 2 .
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinions
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions
E. Applicant's Response
DEPARTMENT O F THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCh4R
I
FROM: HQ AFPClDPPPRA
550 C Street West Ste 12
Randolph AFB TX 78 150-47 14
4 March 1998
SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records (DD Form 149)
1. REQUESTED ACTION. Applicant requests award of the Air Force Good Conduct Medal,
Presidential Unit Citation, and Air Force Outstanding Unit with V.
2. BASIS FOR REQUEST. Applicant served in
0 days.
a. Applicant served on Active
3. FACTS.
19, "Yes - 300 days" for sew
Defense Service Medal. A D
ne1 Records Center adding the
Medal.
74. His DD Form 214 indicates in Item
b. Applicant's 1 Jul70-10 Jun 71 for the
supervision, which'means he
reflects only 60 days of
c. The
70-21 Oct
Nov 71, and the Presidential Unit Citation for the period 8 Feb 71-8 Apr 71.
ing Unit Award with V for the period 1 Apr
mss with Palm for the period 15 Oct 65-10
d. We have verified the applicant's entitlement to the Air Force Outdmding Unit Award
Gallantry Cross with P a b and had his records corrected to
with V and Republic of
reflect these awards (see attached).
e. The applicant is not eligible for the Presidential Unit Citation because he arrived at the
12'" FMS after the closeout date of that award.
f. Applicant is not eligible for the Air Force Good Conduct Medal because there is a letter of
denial in his records, a letter denying him reenlistment because of his conduct, and he had an Un-
favorable Information File (UIF).
4. DISCUSSION. Since the applicant did not arrive in
closeout date of the unit’s Presidential Unit Citation was 8 Apr 71, he is not eligible to share in
this unit award. Applicant was notified of the UIF having been established and that his name
was removed from the promotion list. Any one of these actions makes him ineligible for the Air
Force Good Conduct Medal.
1 10 May 71, and the
5. RECOMMENDATION.
We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for award of the Air Force Good Con-
duct Medal and Presidential Unit Citation.
FOR THE COMMANDER
GEORGIA A. WISE, DAFC
Recognition Programs Branch
Promotions, Eva1 & Recognition Div
.
.
.
.
. .
...-. - . ._ . . . .
. DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER
RANDOLPH AIR PORCE BASE TEXAS
HQ AFPCDPPPRA
550 C Street West Ste 12
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4714
3 March 1998
This is in partial response to your 13 Feb 98 Application for Correction of Military Record
requesting award of the Air Force Good Conduct Medal, Presidential Unit Citation, and Air
Force Outstanding Unit Award with V. This office is responsible for determining Air Force
members' eligibility and entitlement to awards and decorations, and your case was sent to us for
review.
The 12" FMS earned the Republic
allantry Cross with Palm
standing Unit Award (AFOUA) With V while you were assigned to that unit i
will find the AFOUA with V enclosed with this letter. The Air Force does n
eign decorations, but they may be obtained from a commercial source. The following list does
not necessarily constitute Air Force sanction of these frrms:
Medals of America
1929 Fairview Road
Fountain Inn SC 29644
Kel-Lac Uniforms, Inc.
7016 West Highway 90
San Antonio TX 78227
Nasb's Ribbons
149 I 0-M Penis Blvd
Moreno Valley CA 92553
Your records have been forwarded to the appropriate office to have these reflected on your
Report of Separation, and you will hear from them in separate correspondence. Your case will
then be forwarded to the Board regarding the Presidential Unit Citation and Air Force Good
Conduct Medal.
' Sincerely
GEORGIA A. WISE, DAFC
Recognition Programs Branch
Promotion, Eval, & Recognition Division
D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R F O R C E
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E T E X A S
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPPFU
550 C Street West Ste 12
Randolph AFB TX 78 1 50-47 14
17June1998
Records (DD Form 149)
1. REQUESTED ACTION. Applicant requests reconsideration for award of the Presidential
Unit Citation and Air Force Good Conduct Medal.
(UIF) was not established until after 1 Jul73.
3. FACTS.
d a copy of orders to report to
, and states the Unfavorable I
a. Applicant’s Report Not Later Than Date (RNLTD) for
was 15 Feb 71,
with assignment to the 12 Combat Support Group. The unit in question for the Presidential Unit
Citation is the *Field Maintenance Squadron (FMS).
cant did not provide any documentation showing the date he actually signed in
at the
(2) Applicant’s 1 Jul70-10 Jun 71 Enlisted Performance Report reflects 60 days of
supervision, which means he did not sign into th
until 10 May 71.
b. Applicant believes his UIF was not established until 1 Jul73, giving him three years’ eli-
gibility for the Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM). The applicant entered the Air Force
on 1 Jul70, which means the end period for award of the AFGCM would be 30 Jun 73. The
Letter of Denial was dated 30 Jul73, but the period of the denial was 1 May-30 Jun 73, stating,
... during this period ...” the applicant “ has not maintained the standards of military bearing and
behavior.” Furthermore, the applicant was removed from the Promotion Eligibility Roster on 20
Feb 74, and was not selected for reenlistment on 1 Apr 74. Therefore. The applicant does not
have a continuous three-year period of eligibility for the AFGCM.
( 6
8
4. DISCUSSION. Applicant has not provided any documentation to substantiate his claim that
rior to 8 Feb 71 or any documentation showing when he actu-
r actually arrived in Vietnam. Therefore, he is still not con-
for that period. The
Unit Citation awarded to the
date a UIF is established on the applicant has no bearing on his eligibility for the AFGCM. His
commander stated the period of denial was 1 May 73-30 Jun 73. Therefore, he is not eligible for
the AFGCM.
5. RECOMMENDATION.
We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for award of the Presidential Unit
Citation and Air Force Good Conduct Medal.”
FOR THE COMMANDEI),
GEORGIA A. WISE, DAFC
Recognition Programs Branch
Promotions, Eva1 & Recognition Div
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). While on a tour, he stopped the bus for the members to see a herd of camels. This office is responsible for determining Air Force members’ eligibility and entitlement to awards and decorations, and your case was sent to us for review.
- The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant/counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant or counsel.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-01432 COUNSEL : HEARING DESIRED: YES JAN 13m ' Applicant requests that he be awarded the Armed Forces Medal (AFEM) , or other appropriate expeditionary Expeditionary medal, for his service in direct support of operations in Grenada between 23 October 1983 and 21 November 1983. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant. Although requested, he did not fbrnish a copy of his Report of Separation.
The appropriate Air Force off ice evaluated applicant I s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). Applicant requests DD Form 214 reflect his Vietnam Service by adding the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01806 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO Form 214 (Certificate of be corrected to show his listed and the Vietnam Release Vietnam Service Applicant requests that his DD or Discharge From Active Duty) service dates and all schools Medal. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board- -recommending the application be denied...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-01852 COUNSEL : HEARING DESIRED: NO FFB ' 9 l99F I Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 be amended to reflect the country at the end of each overseas tour ribbon. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the The advisory opinion was application be denied (Exhibit C ) . Applicant requests his DD Form 2 14...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). (2) Applicant has not submitted any documentation to substantiate his claim that he re- submitted a recommendation for the Air Medal or a request for reconsideration to upgrade the Aerial Achievement Medal to the Air Medal, or any responses to such submissions. We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for his Aerial...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). (2) Applicant has not submitted any documentation to substantiate his claim that he re- submitted a recommendation for the Air Medal or a request for reconsideration to upgrade the Aerial Achievement Medal to the Air Medal, or any responses to such submissions. We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for his Aerial...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant requests award of the Legion of Merit, recommended 6 Sep 43, but never received. We recommend disapproval of the applicant's request to be awarded the Legion of Merit based on a World War 11 recommendation.