NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04311-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 16 September to 12 November 2004 (copy at Tab A). By memorandum of 18 April 2005 (copy in enclosure (1)), the general court-martial authority (GCMA) concluded “the issue is moot” in light of Petitioner’s command’s message to the Navy Personnel Command (NPC),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04355-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the DT rating (NEC 8708).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Ms. Countryman, and Ms. LeBlanc, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 August 2005 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04372-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to reimbursement for Permanent Change of Station travel when he traveled on a foreign flag carrier.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04427-05
On 9 April 2002 the Commanding Officer (CO) of the 4 th Marine Corps District concurred with the results of both investigations and stated as follows in two separate endorsement letters:The CO Recruiting Station Raleigh is directed to conduct NJP proceedings on (Petitioner) Upon completion of NJP, process aforementioned Marines for Relief for Cause due to Malpractice.Both letters were addressed to “files”, with a copy to the CO, Marine Corps Recruiting Station, Raleigh, North Carolina.f. An...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04455-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. During this period, - was credited with three qualifying years of service in his Marine Corps Career...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04460-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 25 September 1951 at age 17. You served seven months without disciplinary...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04467-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04472-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 481lE9/525, 17 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04489-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 19 December 1984 after four years of prior honorable service. On 18 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04515-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100MEHDocket No.04515-05 30 August 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04525-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice finds as follows: a. f. According to MILPERSMAN 1910-132, a member may be separated by reason of defective enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04544-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with former spouse coverage, at a reduced base amount.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04558-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 4 November 1988. On 27 April 1989 you received a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04581-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum, 1400/3 MMPR-2, 12 August 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04614-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was discharged by reason of physical disability with an honorable discharge and full benefits, and a more favorable reentry code than RE-4.2 The Board consisting of Messrs ~ reviewed Petitioners allegations of error and injustice on 13 July 2006, and pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04637-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 31 July 2001 at age 20. Given the comments and recommendation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04643-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 1 December 1975 at age 19. Subsequently, on 15 November 1977, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04718-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 1 July 1987 at the age of 19 and served for nearly five years without...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04739-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) counseling entry dated 24 February 2005, and by implication, his rebuttal statement dated 2 March 2005, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tab A.2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Davies and Messrs. Boyd and Schultz, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04776-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 June 1999. After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04789-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IT rating (NEC 2780).2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McBride, Pfeiffer, and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2005 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04826-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04829-05
04829-05 10 October 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04905-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 November 2006. Although the service record does not reflect the offenses of which you were convicted, it is clear that you were found guilty by a general court-martial and sentenced to a bad conduct discharge (BCD). In this regard, the Board found no evidence that your BCD has been upgraded or that your rank has been restored, and you have provided no such evidence.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05075-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was authorized an extension of the 180-day period in which to ship household goods (HHGs) at government expense incident to his discharge from the Navy.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Caron, and Haney, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05076-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 30 May 2000. Your conduct and proficiency...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05220-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a USN extension, vice USNR.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05224-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by changing her reenlistment code and restoring her to corporal (CPL; E-4).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Mr. and Ms. -reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05258-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 January 1981. After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05295-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 15 November 1970 after a period of service in an enlisted status, you were commissioned in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05296-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05303-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfort, Dr. Schultz, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05336-05
5336-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UIC 0763A.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05450-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2006. You were discharged from the Naval Reserve on 28 June 2005, without entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy.As the Board was not persuaded that you suffered from strep throat during the 14-28 March 2002 period, and that your disability was incurred while you were performing duty in the Naval Reserve, it was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05480-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 April 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05495-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to Station Allowances for designated location of dependents.2. ~CONCLUSIONUpon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05561-05
5561-05 23 August 2005This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 August 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05566-05
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05571-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was discharged by reason of physical disability, vice a condition, not a disability, that interfered with her performance of duty.2 The Board consisting reviewed Petitioner s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2006, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05599-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a Reserve reenlistment bonus.2 The Board consisting reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05613-05
As requested in reference (a), the Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals (NDBDM) has reviewed petition to award her father, (deceased), a Navy and Marine Corps Medal for his actions on November 7, 1944.2.There is no evidence an award recommendation has previouslybeen submitted for and the material presented is insufficient to consider an award for him at this time. Also required is a properly completed Personal Award Recommendation Form, OPNAV 1650/3, a copy of which is provided...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05624-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 48llAl/394, 11 August 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05640-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05641-05
5641-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the MA rating.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05642-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of you application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, you naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, ‘the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 6 June 1967 to 29 December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05659-05
5659-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the MM rating (NEC 4231).2. The Board, consisting of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05684-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2006. Unlike the VA, the military departments are permitted to assign disability ratings only in those cases where a service member has been found unfit to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating by reason of physical disability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05695-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUSIONUpon review...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05697-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, requlations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05754-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 27 November 1957 after more than two years of...