Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04581-05
Original file (04581-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
        


        LCC
                                                               Docket No. 4581 - 05
                                     23 Aug 05







This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 August 2005. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum, 1400/3 MMPR-2, 12 August 2005, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,


W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
~       



         IN REPLY REFER TO
 1400 3
MMPR-2
AUG 1 2 2005

 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Ref:     (a) BCNR Docket Number 4581-05 dtd 13 Jun 2005
 (b) MCO P1400.29 MARCORPROMMAN
1. Per reference (a) ,   ~sent a congressional request to U.S. Representative ‘~ requesting to receive a promotion to sergeant.
2.       A review of record verifies he was promoted to corporal (E-3) (temporary), his highest rank held, on 1 December 1952. The Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has delegated the authority under certain circumstances for commanders to effect meritorious promotions within the enlisted ranks. There is no evidence contained in Service Record that suggests he was ever nominated, considered by a meritorious board, or approved for meritorious promotion to sergeant by his commanders. was released from active duty on 1 November 1953.
3.       Based on the foregoing, it is recommended that DD Form 214 remain unchanged.


         Major, U.S. Marine Corps
 Head, Enlisted Promotion Section

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06960-06

    Original file (06960-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6960-06 1 Nov 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01187-99

    Original file (01187-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    authoriz s been 344 days of became eligible for promotion to Selected Marine Corps Reserve (SMCR) promotion board however, was not selected due to keen 1993 selection message. selected for promotion by any of the boards who considered his record. Head, Reserve Affairs Personnel Management Branch Reserve Affairs Division By direction r DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT HARRY LEE HALL, QUANTICO, VIRGINIA I7 LEJEUNE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06105-02

    Original file (06105-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01502-07

    Original file (01502-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2, 23 March 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00229-01

    Original file (00229-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03401-02

    Original file (03401-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC: ddj Docket No: 3401-02 10 September 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07923-02

    Original file (07923-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum is attached. board process precludes Sergean based upon a majority vote of the board members, his record was not competitive with the records of the Marines selected for promotion.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03326-06

    Original file (03326-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2, 12 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05091-08

    Original file (05091-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00082-06

    Original file (00082-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) 1450/2 (M1~4PR-2) letter dated 6 April 2005, Subject: Delay of Promotion in Case of Petitioner (copy at Tab A).2. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the CMC 1450/2 Mr4PR-2 letter dated 6 April 2005, Subject: Delay of Promotion in Case...