NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02645-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the lengthy period of your UA. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02648-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your Naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02675-05
Sincerely, Enclosure DEPARTI~NT OF THE NAVY SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS COMBAT-RELATED SPECIAL COMPENSATION BRANCH 201 12TH STREET SUITE 703 ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4357 iN REPLY REFER 10 1850/I CRSC 15 Mar 2005 Subj: APPROVAL OF CRSC UPON RECONSIDERATION IN THE CASE OF~E~ qflUIIgIpUUIqqU~MUJP~4~ USN DOCKET NUMBER NCO4—00680 Ref: (a) 10 U.S. Code 1413a End: (1) DD Form 149 Application for Correction of Military Record 1. Your application package does not establish that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02698-05
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02717-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. During the period from 7 April 1965 to 9 November 1967 you received four nonjudicial punishments (NJP’s) for disrespect, two instances of unauthorized absence (UA) totaling about 35 days, and possession of two liberty cards. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02723-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. The field discharge board subsequently recommended that you be separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness and you were so discharged on 14 December 1962. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02747-05
2. e Board, consisting of Mr. UI~I Mr. and Mr. • reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 October 2005, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The separation authority subsequently approved his request and he was so discharged on 29 June 1970. However, the Board considered Petitioner’s service in Vietnam, the injuries and other medical problems that apparently resulted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02757-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02764-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Ms. Countryman and Ms. LaBlanc, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02807-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02815-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1420 PERS-482l, 13 September 2005, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02821-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JREDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02849-05
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02859-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your Naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were discharged on 20 December 1984 with an other than honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02867-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. The ADB subsequently found that your son had committed misconduct due to drug abuse and recommended that he be separated from the Naval service with an other than honorable discharge. The Board noted that your son was warned after his first drug-related offense that further misconduct could result in administrative separation or disciplinary...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02870-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. On 27 February 1987 he began an unauthorized absence (UA) that ended on 15 March 1987, a period of about 24 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02886-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repetitive misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02897-05
In a letter dated 5 January 2005 to Petitioner (copy in enclosure (1)), the reporting senior explained the document had been submitted “to assist the [CO’s] Trait Average, and enable applicable reports to be graded on the same basis.” He said “These corrections were submitted for three other Evaluation Reports within the same time period.” Finally, he said the changes “should not be viewed as an indication of any change in your performance.” This letter is not in Petitioner’s record. They...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02975-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02999-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve, applied to this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was separated with an honorable or general discharge on 12 May 1978, and be given credit for the time served vice the void enlistment actually issued on that date. As indicated in advisory opinions from the Judge Advocate General, since these individuals were members of the Armed Forces for all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03152-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03178-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 April 1981 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for two periods of failure to go to your appointed place of duty and were awarded...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03232-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your Naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your failure to conform to Marine Corps weight standards, the four NJP’s, and your failure to attain the required average in conduct. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03286-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, advisory opinion, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 17 December 1973 at age 17 with parental...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03306-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Caron, and Haney, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03393-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject’s former spouse, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03424-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 15 April 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03430-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entry grade credit (EGC) for time spent earning advanced degrees.2. DEAN PFEIFFERExecutive Director DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY2300 E STREET NWWASHINGTON DC 20372-5300 IN REPLY REFER TO Ser M1/05UM1—791716 Jun 05From: Chief, Bureau of Medicine and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03432-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 9 May 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03435-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03444-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 3444—0530 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF dmhi.-uuhmm.m-.~ qi~IIIUhIUIiUIIUEUmu~Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board reqLie~ting a better characterization of service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03458-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statute~, regulations and policies. On 25 June 1993 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for failure to obey a lawful order, specifically, the order not to have contact with the FR.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03461-05
03461-05 4 April 2006 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD R Ref: (a) 10 U.S~C. 3 (1) Block 20: Change from “MINS” to “PINS.” (2) Block 43 *36: Change to read “- [PFA] Results: APR 03 P/NS (1st failure) and OCT 03 P/NS (2nd failure) CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting partial relief, specifically, the requested correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03467-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner made a timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay System and is entitled to a lump sun payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB) in the amount of $30,000.00.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Caron, and Haney, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03588-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of his discharge given his extensive disciplinary record and especially the final lengthy period of unauthorized absence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03614-05
The Board, consisting of Mr., Ms.and Ms. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. On 26 October 1988, the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) directed an honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, but also stated that the discharge should be held in abeyance for 30 days to allow Petitioner to transfer to the Retired...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03633-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 13 (“Administrative Remarks”) reflecting two entries dated 21 June 1996; the Commanding Officer,. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, Koman and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 September 2005, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03661-05
3661-05 22 February 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03681-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he has continuous service in the Regular Marine Corps and that his promotion to staff sergeant (SSGT; E-6) be backdated. On 28 March 2000, the Board concluded that an injustice had occurred and directed that the record be corrected to show that on 8 April 1997, the day after his discharge from the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03690-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 9 May 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03814-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 July 1991. After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03845-05
h. On 9 November 1943 the DC’s punishment of 5 November 1943 was published and Petitioner was charged and convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) on that same day of breaking arrest and falsehood. The offense of breaking arrest would not appear to warrant a bad conduct discharge, and there is no evidence in the record to support the offense of falsehood. c. That, upon request, the Veteran’s Administration be informed that Petitioner’s application was received by the Board on 18 May 2005.4.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03858-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner requested an extension of the one-year period in which to ship household goods (HHGs) at government incident to her transfer to the Retired List.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunne, Miller, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 July...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03926-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 3 October 2002. Subsequently, you were found to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04115-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04155-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 27 April 1982. Upon completion of appellate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04156-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2005. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Your service record has been reviewed and it has been determined bhat your reenlistment code of RE-4B was correctly assigned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04242-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your brother’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Official record reviews indicated member’s appointment to CM 2/C effective 01 March 1943. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04301-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Ms. Countryman and Ms. LaBlanc, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04306-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board concurred with the determination of the former Director, Naval...