Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05296-05
Original file (05296-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                             2 NAVY ANNEX
                                              WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
                                                      MEH
                                                                                           Docket No. 5296-05
                                                                                          20 September 2005

From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO
         


Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
 (2)      NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 4811/463 of 2 Sep 05
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.
2.       The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.




Docket No. 5296-05
 RECONNENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a.       The reenlistment executed on or about 12 September 2004 is under the provisions of the STAR program.
b.       He was advanced to Petty Officer Second Class effective 12 September 2004.
c.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, III
Recorder         Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.


20 September 2005
                                                     
W.       DEAN PFEIFFER
 Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05296-02

    Original file (05296-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 4 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09577-05

    Original file (09577-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice 28 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05640-05

    Original file (05640-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04826-05

    Original file (04826-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05641-05

    Original file (05641-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5641-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the MA rating.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05220-05

    Original file (05220-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a USN extension, vice USNR.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05659-05

    Original file (05659-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5659-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the MM rating (NEC 4231).2. The Board, consisting of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05336-05

    Original file (05336-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5336-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UIC 0763A.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06163-05

    Original file (06163-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    6163-05 20 September 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone ‘A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 0311.2. The Board,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02056-04

    Original file (02056-04.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    02056- 04 15 March 2005 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to void a reenlistment and retroactively apply the March 2004 advancement examination results to the September 2003 examination cycle. The...