Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04515-05
Original file (04515-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                             2 NAVY ANNEX
                                             WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

                                             MEH
                                                                                           Docket No. 0 4515-05
                                                                                          30 August 2005

From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO
Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
 (2)      NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 4811/397 of 15 Aug 05
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the AN rating.
2.       The Board, consisting of Messrs. McBride, Pfeiffer, and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.




Docket No. 4515-05



RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a.       The 30 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 18 December 2004, is null and void.
b.       He was discharged on 30 April 2004 and reenlisted on 1 May 2004 (PCS transfer). The term is 3 years.
c.       The above changes will entitle petitioner to a zone “B” SRB with an award level of 1.5 for the AN rating. Remaining obliserve to 17 December 2004 will be deducted from SRB computations.
d.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4.       Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 72 3.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.


ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS~/ III
Recorder         Acting Recorder
5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 72 3.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
         

30 August 2005  





W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

                 

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01244-06

    Original file (01244-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner reenlisted on 9 October 2005 and was authorized payment of Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB)2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Haney, Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07198-06

    Original file (07198-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted USN, vice USNR.2. The Board, consisting of Washington, Chapman, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06553-06

    Original file (06553-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bishop, Mr. Haney, and Mr. Ivins, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06674-06

    Original file (06674-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bishop, Mr. Haney, and Mr. Ivins, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04815-06

    Original file (04815-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CTT(9l4l) rate/NEC.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Ballinger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08861-07

    Original file (08861-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    8861-07 12 February 2008From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06357-06

    Original file (06357-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAW ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100DJCDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bishop, Mr. Haney, and Mr. Ivins, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04610-06

    Original file (04610-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected show she reenlisted vice extended, and to establish entitlement to a zone “A 1 ’ Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Koman, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 Septe~er 2006 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06350-06

    Original file (06350-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    6350-06 31 October 2006From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj:Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bishop, Mr. Haney, and Mr. Ivins, reviewed Petitioner’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09863-07

    Original file (09863-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...