NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04455-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. During this period, - was credited with three qualifying years of service in his Marine Corps Career...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04092-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06325-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2009. In this regard, the Board noted that the recommendation, in the MCRC advisory opinion dated 3 September 2008, to remove this documentation gave no basis for concurring with your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04451-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At the time of separation, mig: - was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-30, which indicates he would not extend/reenlist to comply with Permanent Change of Station (PCS) Orders. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an administrative marking which reflects ‘the member’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05866-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reference requests an advisor opinion onpetition t correct his record to showThat he was retired as a Colonel (0-6 and issue him a SE~ code that calculates his retired pay in a onstandard mannerclaims that his retirement as a Lieutenant Colonel and the SEP code 4ie was assigned upon...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06651-01
considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Heart was authorized for award to those who were wounded or injured as a direct result of action by an enemy of the United States or an opposing armed force of a foreign country in which the Armed Forces of the United...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06627-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07649-07
There is no error in the record. Applicant chose to assault another Marine and his command determined it was appropriate to punish him in accordance with Marine Corps regulations.5. No corrective action is warranted in this case because Applicant fails to demonstrate by substantial evidence that his NJP was in error or an injustice.6.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04195-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2009. The advisory opinion states that during the period from 2003 to 2007, the selection rate was under 30% in 2004 and 2006 and under 43% in 2003 and 2005. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05188-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...