Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04472-05
Original file (04472-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 LCC
Docket No. 4472-05
26 Sep 06


This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 481lE9/525, 17 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
         
                          

                                                                        Sincreley,





                                             
W. DEAN PFIEFFER
Executive Director





Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
                                    MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
 1430
Ser 48llE9/525
17 Aug 06
MEMORANDUM FOR CONGRESSIONAL MATTERS (PERS-3LC2)
Subj:    COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF MA2(SW)
         
         Ref:     (a)      BUPERSINST 1430.16E
                  (b)      DONCAF ltr 5520 Ser O17VABCNR of 21 Dec 05
                  (c)      My ltr 1430 Ser 481159/582 of 25 Oct 05
                  


Encl:    (1) BCNR Files #04472-05


1. Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), enclosure (1) is returned with the following comments.
2.       XXXXXXis requesting that his Final Multiple Score (FMS) of 195.25        from the March 2005 (Cycle 187) be considered for the September 2003 (Cycle 180) - Member was not able to participate for paygrade E6 advancement examination beginning with March 2001 due to a pending
 security clearance final determination.
3.       Reference (c) provided additional information on the process procedure and timelines in the member’s security clearance adjudication Member’s first opportunity to participate for ES exam after the security clearance issue was September 2004 (Cycle 184) resulting in Standard Score (SS) of 41.02 and Pass-not-Advanced (PNA) status with a FMS of 176.32 against the Minimum Multiple Required (MIMR) of 204.78.
         Exam     Cycle    Exam Rate        SS       PMA      SIPG     AWARDS   PNA      FMS      MMR
         March2006        191      MAI      70.06    98       34       10       8        220.06   217.53
         September2005    188      MAI      57.18    98       34       10       4        203.18   207.95
         March2005        187      III      54.25    98       33       10       0        195.25   201.95
         September2004    184      IT1      41.02    93.8     32       10       0        176.82   204.78
         March2004        183      IT1                        31                                  209.20
         September2003    180      III                        30                                  190.40
         March 2003       179      ITI                        29                                  200.60
         September 2002   176      IT1                        28                                  197.51
         March2002        175      IT1                        27                                  197.57
         September2001    172      ITI                        26                                  196.73
         March2001        171      IT1                        25                                  200.17

 It is reasonable that member chooses to compare his Cycle 187 FMS to the lowest NIMR for the IT1 which was Cycle 183 (September 2003) - However, MI4R is established as a cutoff for the particular available quotas and was low on this cycle due to different factors — harder
Subj:    COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF MA2 (SW)


exam, high quota number, etc. There is no single fair basis to compare two advancement cycles FMS for advancement consideration. Pers-481 normally recommends advancement be retroactive to one cycle only once member obtains “selectee” status (on this case, Cycle 191, March 2006 retroactive to Cycle 188, September 2005)

4.       This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Pers-48l point of contact for this matter is PSCS(SW/AW) at extension 4-3238 or





         Head, Enlisted Career Progression
         (PERS-48l)
         By direction
2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09732-05

    Original file (09732-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9732-05 8 Mar 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05921-06

    Original file (05921-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 4811E9/064, 7 February 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05689-06

    Original file (05689-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 48llE9/125, 9 March 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05855-06

    Original file (05855-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00712-11

    Original file (00712-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. Upon being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status in December 2010, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. He had advanced...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05624-05

    Original file (05624-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 48llAl/394, 11 August 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09292-06

    Original file (09292-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 48l1E9/746, 26 December 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06444-06

    Original file (06444-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava1 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07737-06

    Original file (07737-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    7737-06 1 Nov 06This is in reference o your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03061-07

    Original file (03061-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 Ser 811E9/283 of 29 May 2007, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...