NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00479-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner made a timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay System and is entitled to a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB) in the amount of $30,000.00. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00482-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 7 January 1955 the Naval Discharge Review Board denied your request for recharacterization of your service noting, in part, that there was sufficient evidence of your involvement to warrant trial by court-martial, and that you elected the undesirable discharge after being confronted with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00490-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00494-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. conduct discharge was issued on 10 May 1963. confinement at hard labor for three The to forfeiture of $40 pay per On 2 April 1965 you elected The bad such as your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00497-03
The Board was not persuaded that the contested fitness report was used as a counseling tool, nor could it find the reporting senior engaged in “blatant conjecture” by stating, in section G, that you were absent without authority on one occasion. Per subparagraph S001.3e of reference (b), a mark of unsatisfactory” in Item K3 does not constitute new adverse mateial when the Reporting Senior has already marked the Marine reported on adversely in one or more attributes in Sections D through H....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00500-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 7 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. c. Information regarding the SBP open enrollment periods was widely publicized in "Shift Colors" (the Navy retirees' quarterly newsletter) which is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00505-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2003. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00526-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, flied enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner elected lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus, $30,000.00 on 17 July 2002. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kim, McPartlin, and Nicholson, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00529-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. In his petition, Petty Officer was told at the Charlotte MEPS that he was not el He requests favorable action that will allow payment of an EB. Every recruit is not offc~ed n"l- r ~ c e i i r e ~ an EB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00566-03
Applicant must meet the applicable education requirements for at c. least one of the ratings offered in the field in which they are enlisting. GTEP applicants are guaranteed assignment to an "A" school for a rating within the field they enlisted. 31-4 GENDET Homeport Guarantee Program g. The GENDET Homeport Guarantee Program provides individuals enlisting in either the two, three or four-year obligor GENDET program guaranteed assignment to one of six homeports upon successful completion of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00594-03
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Grover, and Frankfurt, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00596-03
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 596-03 15 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a 3 year...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00599-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Further, the suspended reduction to paygrade E-3 was vacated from the previous NJP. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00601-03
If your le A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2003. approved your separation and on that same day, you were discharged with an entry-level separation by reason of e enlistment due to the diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00603-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00633-03
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2003. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00646-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Leeman, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 April 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00649-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Grover, and Frankfurt, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00658-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2003 Major Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunne,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00662-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00669-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2003. ~of five absences, he was convicted by the GCM and sentenced'him He was so discharged on 12 May 1946. f o a BCD. a presumption of regularity attaches to all official Consequently, when applying for a correction of an naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00674-03
I DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OFNAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ecb Docket No: 28 October 2003 674-03 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Neuschafer, and McBride Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00676-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was ~ insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. were convicted by summary court martial (SCM) of instances of disobedience of a superior officer and sentenced to fifteen days of confinement at hard labor and a forfeiture of pay. I July~l963...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00693-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Enlistment Bonus (EB) entitlement.. 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Harrison, and Grover, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 April 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00697-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Mr. service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE—3P was correctly assigned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00705-03
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00705-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00713-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 18 June 2003. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your fraudulent enlistment in the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00715-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 26 August 1970, an administrative discharge board (ADB) unanimously recommended that you be separated with a general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00717-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00722-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharcterization of your discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial by court martial for a lengthy period of UA that was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00734-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. automatically b. public Law 105-85 enacted 18 November 1997, authorized SBP participants to voluntarily discontinue SBP participation during the one-year period beginning on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00735-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. unanimously...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00736-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 March to 9 June 2001. ’s ’s record and e. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner ’s naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00746-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 746-03 29 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy End: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 81 1A1/185 of 26 March 2003 (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00751-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Given the existence of such a disorder, and since retention would have posed a threat to yourself and others, the Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00756-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Navy Drug Screening Laboratory, Great Lakes, reported a methamphetamine concentration approximately 8,072 concentration of 6,820 ng/mL, consistent with recent use of illicit methamphetamine. akey c. The information provided methamphetamine/amphetamine Correction of the urinalysis test result.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00758-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former commissioned officer in the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve, vice being discharged. He became 60 years old on 26 March 1989 and has been receiving his retired pay as a "former member" since then. d. At enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from the Navy Personnel Command (Pers 911), recommending that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00761-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In his petition, action that would allow paym CF Program quests favorable EB College Kicker.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00762-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. N130 recommends disapproval of for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) Colleg 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00769-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. 0769-03 The reference requests an advisory opinion on'- .l__y_ petition to correct her late former husband's records to show that he was enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with former spouse coverage when he died on 12 May 2002. Because it was the intention of the civil court that Gunnery Sergeant Slaterl s SBP coverage continue on as a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00771-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner made a timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay System and is entitled to a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB) in the amount of $30,000.00. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00779-03
00779-03 25 August 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00780-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your misconduct that resulted in three NJPs, a SCM conviction for a lengthy period of unauthorized absence, and the civil conviction for drug possession. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00787-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00793-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner made a timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay System and is entitled to a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB) in the amount of $30,000.00. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00797-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00798-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Grover, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00812-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on.4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 22 June 1983 you received a second NJP for a unauthorized absence, and were awarded a reduction to paygrade 2, forfeitures of pay, restriction, and extra duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00817-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Harrison, and Grover, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 April 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...