DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 756-03
3 September 2003
Your allegations of error and
prov&sions of title 10 of the United
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06329-02
Additionally, the Board concurred with the Accordingly, your application has been The names and votes of the members of the panel will be In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all such as your youth and immaturity potentially mitigating factors, and the contention that you should be reinstated since your positive urinalysis for ecstacy was flawed, based on a newspaper However, the Board concluded that article on Navy drug testing. The Department of Defense (D Progra...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10826-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 10826-02 11 September 2003 The Board also considered an advisory opinion on.a from the Navy Environmental Health Your allegations of error and application for correction of your provisions of title 10 of the United This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code section 1552. commanding officer's decision at NJP that you had used drugs was reasonable, given...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08356-00
The advisory opinion opined that second hand marijuana smoke or Vicks inhaler would not cause a false positive the use of a Further, the opinion found that the other listed urinalysis. medications provided in the statements by you and Dr. H would not, alone or in any combination, produce false positive results for methamphetamine, amphetamine or marijuana with the testing procedures utilized by the Navy Drug Screening Laboratories. In the subject case the Navy Drug Screening Laboratory...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07685-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. (13) to investigate the possibility of a positive urine drug test as a result of daily ingestion of various amounts of these “new’ t preparations, with total daily doses of THC ranging from 0.09 to 0.6 mg (equivalent to 45-300 g of hulled hemp seeds containing 2 /Lg/g THC or 19—120 mL of hemp-seed oil at 5 mg/L THC) in the form of blends of hemp- seed...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500088
5420 CORB:003 14 Feb 06 From: Secretarial Review AuthorityTo: Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Via: President, Naval Discharge Review BoardSubj: REQUEST FOR REVIEW: CASE OF H------O. MC____-, (B---------) , EX AT2, USNR DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-AT2, USNR Docket No. The Navy’s Drug Lab urinalysis test has indicated that her urine sample has indeed tested positive for cocaine, yet a civilian hair DNA test has...
CG | BCMR | Alcohol and Drug Cases | 2002-093
of the Personnel Manual, his CO was recommending that he be administratively discharged from the Coast Guard. He argued that because the applicant acknowledged his rights, declined to make a statement, and signed the first endorsement on his CO’s recommendation for his discharge, the applicant was not denied any due process regarding his discharge. He contended that the “irregularity” with which the CO handled the charges against him likely resulted in his command applying...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101712
The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05912-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 1999 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. were so separated on 7 April 1998. recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007240
The unit conducted a urinalysis on 10 December 2011 and the applicant tested positive for cocaine. He does not do cocaine but he did use the coca tea. c. At the applicant's administrative separation board, a doctor from the drug testing lab states that for the level of cocaine in the applicant's specimen, he would have had to drink five cups of tea within four to five hours of the urinalysis, based on the rate at which it metabolizes.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03737-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. fully supported the other than honorable discharge, based on the positive urinalysis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...