DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
FC
Docket No: 00599-03
16 June 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 June 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof,
your'naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
On 14 May 1981 you
The Board found that you reenlisted on 12 November 1980 after
about three years of prior active service.
received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for absence from your
appointed place of duty, and were awarded a forfeiture of pay and
a suspended reduction to
received a second NJP for failure to go your appointed place of
duty at the prescribed time and dereliction of duty and were
awarded a reduction to
paygrade E-4 and forfeitures of pay. On
23 October 1982 you were awarded a third NJP for driving on base
while under suspension, and were awarded forfeitures of pay and a
suspended reduction in
received a fourth NJP for absence from your appointed place of
duty and disobedience of a direct order to remove a gas mask, and
were awarded restriction and extra duty.
Further, the suspended
reduction to
paygrade E-3 was vacated from the previous NJP. On
On 4 September 1981 you
paygrade E-4.
paygrade to E-3.
On 21 January 1983 you
4 May 1983 you completed inpatient level III alcohol
rehabilitation treatment.
On 23 September 1983 you received a
fifth NJP for absence from your appointed place of duty and were
paygrade E-2, forfeitures of pay, extra
awarded a reduction to
duty and suspended restriction.
On 13 October 1983, you were notified of administrative
separation processing and you waived all of your procedural
rights.
On 21 October 1983 the commanding officer recommended an
other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to a
pattern of misconduct.
authority directed discharge, and on 11 November 1983 you were
discharged under other than honorable conditions.
On 1 November 1983, the separation
However,
the Board carefully weighed all
In its review of your case,
potentially mitigating factors such as the period of good
service during your first enlistment,
that has passed since you were discharged from the Marine Corps,
and your contention of alcohol dependency during you period of
service.
the Board found that these factors were not
sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given
your frequent misconduct that resulted in five
your contention of alcohol dependency,
were provided inpatient alcohol rehabilitation treatment.
However, you received your fifth NJP about four months after
completing this treatment.
the record showed that you were treated fairly.
your application has been denied.
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Accordingly,
The names and votes of the
Therefore, the Board concluded that
and the length of time
Concerning
the record shows that you
NJPs.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05149-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 14 November 1980 after three years of prior honorable service. On that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03764-01
Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. you& appointed place of duty On 25 October 1983 vou received was On 15 November 1983 the BCD was to be executed, Subsequently, the suspension of the forfeitures and BCD were vacated. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden‘is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00996-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 27 November 1981 at age 17. On 28 February 1985 the commanding officer recommended an other than...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07210-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00966-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establishtie i~~~iiç~ of p~ub b~e lit Le error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 27 November 1981 at age 17. On 28 February 1985 the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03029-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The punishment imposed was a $286 forfeiture of pay, restriction for 30 days, extra duty for 45 days, and a reduction to On 14 December 1982, after undergoing a medical evaluation, medical authorities determined that you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03349-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. At that time you denied suicidal ideation On 19 February 1982, after undergoing a You were sentenced to a $900 forfeiture paygrade E-l. On 12 April 1982 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01244-04
Documentary the material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was ±ris~if I iCi N1t. On 8 June 1981 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for a five-day period of unauthorized absence (UA) and were awarded forfeitures of pay, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04771-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your third NJP you were diagnosed as an alcohol abuser and were recommended for a Level II Alcohol Abuse Treatment Program. dependent and were recommended for a Level III inpatient program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06179-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. received NJP for failure to go to your appointed place of duty, and assault. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...