Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00500-03
Original file (00500-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  CORRECTION  OF  NAVALRECORDS 

2  NAVYANNEX 

WASHINGTON  DC  2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

MEH: ddj 
Docket No:  500-03 
15 April  2003 

This is in  reference to your application for correction of  your deceased  spouse's  naval record 
pursuant to the provisions of  title  10 of the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A  three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered your application on  15 April 2003.  Your allegations of  error and injustice 
were reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of this Board.  Documentary  material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with all material submitted in  support thereof, your spouse's  naval record 
and applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  NPC  memorandum of  7 March  2003, a copy of  which  is attached. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of  the entire record, the Board  found  that the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly,  your application has been  denied.  The names and votes of 
the members of  the panel will be  furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted  that the circumstances of your case are such  that  favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an official naval  record,  the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT O F  THE NAVY 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE 

MILLINGTON T N  38055-0000 

7 Mar 03 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Via:  Assistant for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOZCB) 

Subj : 

Ref: 

(a) BCNR Pay memo of 13 Feb 03 
(b) Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation 

(DoDFMR) Volume 7B 

) ,   recommend the BCNR not correct 
record to reflect that he elected spouse and 
e Survivor Benefit Plan  (SBP) on 1 July 1977. 

2.  The recommendation is based on the following: 

a. 

transferred to the Retired List on 

1 July 1977.  He enrolled his eligible incapacitated child in the 
SBP at that time. 

b.  Per reference  (b), a member with an eligible spouse, who 
elects coverage for his or her eligible child is prohibited from 

xcept during an open enrollment 
was permitted to enroll his spouse 

during the 1 October 1981 to 30 September 1982 and the 
1 April 1992 to 31 March 1993 open-enrollment periods.  He did 
not elect to enroll his spouse during either open enrollment 
period. 

c.  Information regarding the SBP open enrollment periods was 
widely publicized in "Shift Colors" (the Navy retirees' quarterly 
newsletter) which is provided to all Navy retirees who maintain 
up to date address information at the Defense Finance and 
Accounting Service-Cleveland Center  (DFAS-CL) .  It is the 
responsibility of the service member to ensure that this 
information is current. 

Subj : 

as not provided  sufficient evidence that her 

enroll her in the SBP.  Additionally, 

once annually, which identified his participation in the child 
only coverage category. 

received a retiree account  statement, at  least 

Survivor Benefit  Plan 
Retired Activities and GI 
Bill  Programs Branch 
(PERS-664) 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05261-03

    Original file (05261-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. packages explaining the program and offering them an opportunity to enroll in the SBP during the 2 20 September 1973 open season.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09563-02

    Original file (09563-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This statement identified him as a participant in the SBP Children only coverage, and he took no action to enroll his spouse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08438-01

    Original file (08438-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When you were divorced in November 1999 the court ordered you to furnish your former spouse with SBP coverage. In response to reference (a), recommend the BCNR not correct Petty Officer -record changed his election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage category within one year of his divorce. Additionally, a member who refuses coverage for an eligible spouse in favor of children only category is prohibited from electing spouse coverage at a later date...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08279-07

    Original file (08279-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 7 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00888-07

    Original file (00888-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 11 Apr 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06133-03

    Original file (06133-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per .reference (a) , recommend BCNR not correct -record Benefit Plan (SBP).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08304-07

    Original file (08304-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 13 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03140-03

    Original file (03140-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct record to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00769-03

    Original file (00769-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. 0769-03 The reference requests an advisory opinion on'- .l__y_ petition to correct her late former husband's records to show that he was enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with former spouse coverage when he died on 12 May 2002. Because it was the intention of the civil court that Gunnery Sergeant Slaterl s SBP coverage continue on as a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05886-08

    Original file (05886-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct record to reflect that he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).