Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00751-03
Original file (00751-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT  OF THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  CORRECTION  OF  NAVAL  RECORDS 

2   N A V Y A N N E X  

WASHINGTON  DC  2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

CRS 
Docket No:  751-03 
15 October 2003 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your 
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United 
States Code section 1552. 

A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval 
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 
application on 10 September 2003.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board consisted of 
your application, together with all material submitted in support 
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations 
and policies. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire 
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was 
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material 
error or injustice. 

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 28 May  2002.  A 
psychiatric evaluation, conducted on 4 June 2002, diagnosed you 
with a bipolar disorder and concluded that your retention in the 
Navy would pose a significant risk of injury to yourself and 
others.  On 28 June 2002 you received an entry level separation 
by  reason of erroneous enlistment.  At that time, you were 
assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. 

The Board noted that an RE-4  reenlistment code is authorized by 
regulatory guidance and is often assigned to an individual 
separated by  reason of erroneous enlistment due to a mental 
disorder.  Given the existence of such a disorder, and since 
retention would have posed a threat to yourself and others, the 
Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your 
reenlistment code.  Accordingly, your application has been 
denied.  The names and votes of the members of the panel will be 
furnished upon request. 

It is r ~ g r e t + ~ d  

t h a t   the  circumstance^  ef your caso  aro  such that 

favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the 
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the Board. 
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a 
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. 
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval 
record, the burden  is on the applicant to demonstrate the 
existence of probable material error or injustice. 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03870-03

    Original file (03870-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 30 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00430-02

    Original file (00430-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You claimed recurrent suicidal ideation since arriving at recruit training and stabbed yourself because "Nobody would listen to me...now they are listening."

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07992-02

    Original file (07992-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2003. As a result of this hospitalization, a psychological evaluation diagnosed you as having a borderline personality disorder with narcissistic features and alcohol dependence. It was recommended that you receive alcohol rehabilitation treatment and that you be administratively separated due to your diagnosed personality disorder.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09632-02

    Original file (09632-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel o$ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Although the documents concerning your separation processing are not contained in your records, it is clear that you were processed for separation by reason of fraudulent entry due to your failure to disclose pre-service medical treatment and diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00532-02

    Original file (00532-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07314-01

    Original file (07314-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You enlisted in the Navy on 3 August 1994 for four years at age 18.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02644-03

    Original file (02644-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    approved your separation and on 19 December 2001, you were discharged with an entry-level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed depressive and personality disorders. depressive and personality disorders, would have posed a threat to yourself and others, the Board Given the severity of the diagnosed and since your retention concluded that the RE-4 reenlistment code was properly and Accordingly, your request has been appropriately assigned. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07315-01

    Original file (07315-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Absent such evidence, the Board concluded that the reason for discharge and separation code were appropriate.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08468-02

    Original file (08468-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Given the existence of such a disorder, and your suicidal thoughts, the Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00601-03

    Original file (00601-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If your le A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2003. approved your separation and on that same day, you were discharged with an entry-level separation by reason of e enlistment due to the diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.