DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
I
Docket No: 00676-03
16 June 200 3
h
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of t
United States Code section 1552.
e
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 June 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutks,
regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was ~
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
entire
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 30
age 17.
On 7 January 1964 you received nonjudicial
(NJP) for a seven-day period of unauthorized absence
awarded restriction and forfeitures of pay.
were convicted by summary court martial (SCM) of
instances of disobedience of a superior officer and
sentenced to fifteen days of confinement at hard labor and a
forfeiture of pay.
On 3 May 1963 you received a second
brief period of unauthorized absence and were awarded a
forfeiture of pay.
On 17
were!
I
July~l963 at
puni$hment
and~were
April~l964 you
assaultiand two
NJP for a
I
On 25 August 1966 you were convicted by special
(SPCM) of a 48-day period of unauthorized absence and we
sentenced to a reduction to
confinement for two months.
suspended.
paygrade E-l, forfeitures
Portions of the sentence we
12 December 1966 the
However, on
of the sentence were vacated due to continued misconduct. On 29
December 1966 you were convicted by a second SPCM of a
61 day
period of unauthorized absence and were awarded a bad conduct
discharge
for three months.
request restoration to duty and requested execution of
discharge adjudged by the second SPCM.
were granted appellate leave.
appellate review, you were separated with a BCD.
(BCD), forfeitures of pay and confinement at hard labor
On 30 September 1968, you waived the right to
On 24 May 1967, upon completion of
On 21 March
1967,, you
t.le
In its review of your case, the Board carefully weighed
potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and
immaturity, and the length of time that has passed
were discharged from the Navy.
these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacter'zation
of your discharge given your frequent and serious miscon uct
1
that resulted in an NJP and convictions by a SCM and
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
since~you
However, the Board found that
twolSPCMs.
The nameS and
11
a
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of
material evidence or other matter not previously
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
existence of probable material error or injustice.
consider ed by
it is important to keep in mind that
demonstr+te the
In this regard,
entitled~to have
You are
newland
ret rds.
offic
Pal
I
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03027-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to.warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three NUP’s and conviction by two SCM’s and one SPCM for serious misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05129-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Cofisequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01094-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of seven...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10506-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval’ Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing the characterization of your discharge, given your record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10343-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 26 October 1966 you were convicted by SPCM of a 67 day period of UA and were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for six months, a $342...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00989-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 November 2009. You received confinement and a forfeiture of pay. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08189-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2001.. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable Board. to go to your appointed special court-martial (SPCM) of failure place of duty and were sentenced to hard labor for a month and a $60 forfeiture of pay. paygrade E-l and restriction for 15 convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of disobedience and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07333-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable stdtutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04031-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 5 November 1965 and 3 March 1967, you received two more NUJP’s for a four-day period of UA and another period of UA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06450-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of two NJP’s...