DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
FC
Docket No:
2OC
16 June
10601-03
!
This is in reference to your application for correction
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of t
United States Code section 1552.
If your
le
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 June 2003.
Your allegations of error
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrativ
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board con
of your application, together with all material submitte
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statut
regulations and policies.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 7 June
On 17 June 2001 you were diagnosed as having an
age 23.
adjustment disorder, with mixed anxiety and depressed mo
psychiatrist concluded that if retained you would pose a
to yourself and others.
On 21 June 2001, you were advised of administrative sepa
processing and waived all your procedural rights except
to obtain copies of documents supporting the basis for t
proposed separation.
approved your separation and on that same day, you were
discharged with an entry-level separation by reason of e
enlistment due to the diagnosed adjustment disorder. At
time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
On 27 June 2001,
the commanding of
nd
of this
isted
in
s1
001 at
d.
The
threat
ation
he right
e
icer
roneous
that
Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE
t8
reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due
erroneous enlistment.
Given the diagnosed adjustment di
and since your retention would have posed a threat to
yo.
and others, the Board concluded that the RE-4 reenlistme:
was properly and appropriately assigned.
yt
Accordingly,
4
an
order,
rself
t code
ur
request has been denied.
the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the me
ers of
"p
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
~
I
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07992-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2003. As a result of this hospitalization, a psychological evaluation diagnosed you as having a borderline personality disorder with narcissistic features and alcohol dependence. It was recommended that you receive alcohol rehabilitation treatment and that you be administratively separated due to your diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02644-03
approved your separation and on 19 December 2001, you were discharged with an entry-level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed depressive and personality disorders. depressive and personality disorders, would have posed a threat to yourself and others, the Board Given the severity of the diagnosed and since your retention concluded that the RE-4 reenlistment code was properly and Accordingly, your request has been appropriately assigned. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00941-10
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice: You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 25 July 2001. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change to your RE-4 reenlistment code given your NUP and diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01880-01
opinion furnished by the Specialty Advisory to the Surgeon General for Psychiatry, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support Your allegations of error and a copy of which is attached. * The Board found that on 10 November 1994 you enlisted in the Navy 'The record reflects that on 27 February 1995, while at age 18. under...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00751-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Given the existence of such a disorder, and since retention would have posed a threat to yourself and others, the Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02469-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. The record reflects that on 30 June 1998 you were referred to a mental health unit because of suicidal ideation, inability to tolerate authority, and a prior undisclosed history of psychiatric treatment. Separation by erroneous entry is authorized when an enlistment would not have occurred if a disqualifying factor had been known prior to enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02586-02
the separation authority directed separation, you received an general discharge 2001, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. byyeason of personality disorder on 30 March You After Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 or RE-3G reenlistment code to an individual separated by reason of Due to the severity of your personality personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00151-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session considered your application on 6 June injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03886-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority Thereafter, You did not You were The fact that you did not receive The Board noted your contention to the effect that you During classification interviews in recruit it is determined whether an individual is qualified for "A" school, even though you had and as a result...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02175-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2003. The Board did not consider whether the characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed since you did not request such action and you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge and Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...