Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00812-03
Original file (00812-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

FC
Docket No: 00812-03
8 September 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on.4 September 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 14
February 1982 at age 17.
punishment 
and were awarded a forfeiture of pay.

(NJP) for absence from your appointed place of duty,

On 12 May 1983 you received nonjudicial

On 10 June 1983 your urine sample tested positive for drugs. On
22 June 1983 you received a second NJP for a 
unauthorized absence, and were awarded a reduction to 
paygrade 
2, forfeitures of pay, restriction, and extra duty.
On 20 July
1983 you received a third NJP for disobedience, and were awarded
a reduction to 
1983 you were counseled concerning your deficiencies in conduct
and performance.

paygrade E-l and forfeitures of pay.

18-day period of

E-

On 1 August

On 1 August 1983, you were notified of administrative separation
processing and you waived all of your procedural rights.
August 1983 the commanding officer recommended an other than
honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
On 15 August 1983, the staff judge advocate concurred with the
recommendation of the commanding officer.
separation authority directed that you be separated with an other
than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.
1983, you were discharged under other than honorable conditions
by reason of misconduct due to drug use and assigned a
reenlistment code of RE-4.

On 19 August 1983, the

On 5

On 2 September

In its review of your case, the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity
and the time that has passed since you were discharged from the
Marine Corps.
However, the Board found that these factors were
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
given your misconduct that resulted in three 
especially your use of drugs.
been denied.
will be furnished upon request.

The names and votes of the members of the panel

Accordingly, your application has

NJPs, and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

it is important to keep in mind that

You are entitled to have

In this regard,



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00599-03

    Original file (00599-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Further, the suspended reduction to paygrade E-3 was vacated from the previous NJP. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07210-02

    Original file (07210-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02598-03

    Original file (02598-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in _ support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also noted the previous positive urinalysis test for marijuana for which you did not receive disciplinary action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02198-04

    Original file (02198-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 1 August 1980 at age 20. You served...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07508-02

    Original file (07508-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2003. On 14 April 1983 you received NJP for breach of peace and assault and were awarded restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to paygrade E-2, and a $250 forfeiture of pay. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07792-01

    Original file (07792-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10192-02

    Original file (10192-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 28 September 1985, the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05483-00

    Original file (05483-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    absence from your appointed Your record further reflects that on 8 March 1985 you received NJP for wrongful use of marijuana and were awarded a $600 forfeiture of pay, extra duty for 14 days, and a reduction to paygrade E-2. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01749-00

    Original file (01749-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. However, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the serious Given all the nature of your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02673-03

    Original file (02673-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 17 August 1981 you were convicted by summary court martial (SCM) of disrespect, and were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 30 days, and a forfeiture of pay. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...