Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09338-02
Original file (09338-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
        
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 9338-02
26 March 2003

From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2)      NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/060 19 of 24 January 2003
(3)      Subject’s naval record

1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his enlistment is in paygrade E4 based on the provisions of the Direct Procurement Enlistment Program..

2.       The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.


Docket No: 9338-02

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that the enlistment of 25 March 2002 is in the rate/grade of MA3/E4.

a.       That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.

4.       Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.


ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        G. L. ADAMS
Recorder         Acting Recorder

5.        Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.


26 March 2003


                                                                        W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                                                                        Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00681-02

    Original file (00681-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to ET3/E4 upon completion of ET “A” School paygrade 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Brezna, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 5 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09673-02

    Original file (09673-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09351-02

    Original file (09351-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E3 based on the completion of three years of JROTC.. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08085-02

    Original file (08085-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the enlistment of 29 November 2001 is in paygrade E4, vice E3. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05544-02

    Original file (05544-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in a higher paygrade.. 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09888-02

    Original file (09888-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the period from 29 March 2002 to 18 April 2002 is reflected as regular duty vice accrued leave. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and Morgan, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07931-02

    Original file (07931-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show unearned Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) was not recouped. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10774-02

    Original file (10774-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UJC 66691. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10744-02

    Original file (10744-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ABF rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10376-02

    Original file (10376-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CTM rating (NEC 9238). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...