Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09305-02
Original file (09305-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                                             BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                                      2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
                                                                                                   JLP:ddj
                                                                                                   Docket No: 9305-02
                                                                                                   19 March 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N13OD1/03U0167 of 6 March 2003, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,



W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10457-02

    Original file (10457-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYCHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNEL WASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N13OD1/ 03U0112 3...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08636-02

    Original file (08636-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYOFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000IN REPLY REFER TO 5420N13OD1 6 Mar 2003...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07564-02

    Original file (07564-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09068-02

    Original file (09068-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02746-03

    Original file (02746-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum, 1430 Ser 811 is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02357-03

    Original file (02357-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03377-03

    Original file (03377-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by OPNAV memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. the following recommendation concerning enclosure (1) A Career Status Bonus (CSB) GENADMIN Notification message was 2. m on 12 August 2002 offering him the released...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08257-02

    Original file (08257-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reference requests an advisory opinion on XXXX request for Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for the periods of annual training, during the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10607-08

    Original file (10607-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 19 February 2009, a copy of which is attached, and your letter dated 12 March 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10050-02

    Original file (10050-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2003 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In response to reference (a), we have reviewed enclosure (1).