DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JRE
Docket
6 May
No. 09371-02
2003
This is in reference to your application for corri
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title
United States Code, section 1552.
?ction of your
LO of the
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction #)f Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1 May 2003. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with admini.;trative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proct?edings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Bo-ird consisted
of your application, together with all material sitbmitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of i.he entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submittb?d was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
errur or injustice.
The Board was not persuaded that you sustained a .iignificant
back injury, hearing loss, or injured finger durillg your service
in the Navy from 26 October 1967 to 26 August 197:. None of
those conditions is documented in your record, anal you have not
presented any evidence which demonstrates that yo11 suffered from
any of those conditions. In addition, it rejected your
contention that you did not receive a hearing test- on your pre-
separation physical examination. In this regard, it noted that
the report of your pre-separation examination ind-cates, in item
70, that you passed a whispered voice test.
In the absence of'evidence of error or injustice in your rec:ord,
the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your
case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your c~jse are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are +rlLitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submissior~ (if new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all offic-i.al records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of a l l official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to dumonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFF'ER
Executive Direztor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04463-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06453-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2003. The fact that the VA has awarded you substantial disability ratings is not probative of the existence of error in your Navy record, because the VA assigns disability ratings without regard to the issue of fitness for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04209-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07584-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You denied a history of asthma and shortness of breath, but disclosed that you had been treated for pneumonia.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07327-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05703-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It noted that you did not complain of any of the hallmark symptoms of that disorder during your Navy service, or for many years thereafter, and there is no indication in your Navy record that you were suffering from a significant mental disorder prior to your discharge. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04800-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not accept your contention to the effect that the acts of misconduct which resulted in your reduction to grade E-3 and discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court- martial were attributable to the effects of an undiagnosed medical condition; that you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01732-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, and the record of the two previous reviews of your application by the Board. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by the Director, Naval Council of Personnel Boards dated 1 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. An SNMHAS record entry dated 12 August 1987 indicates...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR7709 12
Rh three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 December 2033 Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administr regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In this regard, it noted that at some time after marijuana is used, x nanograms of THC metabolites will be present in the user’s urine, and that that amount will diminish over time until the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01149-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...