DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 9527-02
19 December 2002
referen
This is in
naval record pursu
Secti
States Code,
A three-member pan
injustice were rev
regulations and pr
Board.
Documentar
your application,
thereof, your nava
and policies.
to your application for correction of your
t to the provisions of Title 10, United
of the Board for Correction of Naval
executive session, considered your
Your allegations of error and
ember 2002.
ed in accordance with administrative
edures applicable to the proceedings of this
aterial considered by the Board consisted of
ether with all material submitted in support
record and applicable statutes, regulations
error or injustice.
nonjudicial punishm
Although your
recor
general discharge
were assigned a re
misconduct.
injustice in the as
Accordingly, your a
scientious consideration of the entire
d that the evidence submitted was
ish the existence of probable material
ou enlisted in the Navy on 29 November
ects that on 11 September 2000 you received
t for use of a controlled substance.
does not contain the separation processing
that the commanding officer recommended
ral discharge by reason of
after review by the discharge
The
for separation was approved.
endation
that on 28 December 2000 you received a
reason of misconduct.
At that time, you
listment code of RE-4.
require the assignment of an RE-4
en an individual is discharged due to
ou have been treated no differently than
gnment of your reenlistment code.
lication has been denied.
the Board could not find an error or
The names and
votes of the member
The Board did not
service or reason
not ask for such c
administrative re
Board (NDRB).
DD Form 293.
It is regretted th
favorable
Board reconsider i
evidence or other
In this regard, it
presumption of reg
Consequently, when
record, the burden
existence of pr
actio
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
sider whether your characterization of
separation should be changed, since you did
ideration and you have not exhausted your
by applying to the Naval Discharge Review
ay apply to NDRB by submitting the attached
the circumstances of your case are such that
ot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
decision upon submission of new and material
tter not previously considered by the Board.
s important to keep in mind that a
arity attaches to all official records.
pplying for a correction of an official naval
s on the applicant to demonstrate the
material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04734-01
The offenses of the Board for Correction of Naval naval,record and applicable statutes, regulations .of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of t gether with all material submitted in support / Dear' This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service should be changed, since you did not ask for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09794-02
Your allegations of error and ed in accordance with administrative applicable to the proceedings of this edures aterial considered by the Board consisted of ether with all material submitted in support ecord and applicable statutes, regulations scientious consideration of the entire d that the evidence submitted was ish the existence of probable material at during your enlistment 29 April 1997. ou enlisted in the Navy on d to disclose that you had been a frequent on 26 June 1998 you received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08352-02
Your allegations of error and ed in accordance with administrative dures applicable to the proceedings of this aterial considered by the Board consisted of with all material submitted in support ecord and applicable statutes, regulations scientious consideration of the entire nd that the evidence submitted was the existence of probable material nlisted in the Navy on 13 January 2000. ed a written request for an other than n order to avoid trial by court-martial for om 4 April to 26 May 2000....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02065-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04234-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2002. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08823-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of h all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and your application, together applicable statutes, regulat opinion furnished by NPC which is attached. Consequently, on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice. The petitioner at 3 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02023-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2009. ‘Documentary material considered by the Board consisted: of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05457-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 13 April 2000, you enlisted in the Navy at age 17 with parental consent. On 29 September 2002, one...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07341-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of togetheriwith all material submitted in support your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations Your allegations of error and After careful and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01227-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...