DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No:
11 September 2003
9442-02
Your allegations of error and
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 September 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 13 December 1996 for four
years.
active duty on a previous enlistment.
counseled because you would not reenlist or extend your
enlistment for orders.
nonjudicial punishment for disobedience.
was a reduction in grade from sergeant to corporal (CPL; E-4).
You were released from active duty on 12 December 2000 in the
grade of CPL.
At that time you were not recommended for
reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
On 8 October 1992, Headquarters Marine Corps determined that an
RE-3C reenlistment code was more appropriate in your case, and
directed a change in your DD Form 214 to show that reenlistment
code.
change.
Regulations state that an RE-3C reenlistment code is assigned
when a restrictive reenlistment code is warranted and no other
code fits the circumstances.
An
waived and reenlistment authorized.
Apparently, your record has been corrected to reflect this
At that time, you had completed almost four years of
About a year later, you received
RE-3C reenlistment code may be
However, the decision
On 7 October 1998 you were
The punishment imposed
whether or not to grant a waiver is a matter within the sole
discretion of recruiting authorities.
Since you were reduced in grade as a result of the NJP, you were
a CPL with almost eight years of service at the time of your
discharge.
This is the time in service limitation for a CPL and
this limitation apparently was a factor in your case.
disciplinary record,
length of service and grade at the time of
your discharge, the Board concluded that the restrictive RE-3C
reenlistment code is appropriate and no change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case
are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
The names and
Given your
Sincerely,
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Sep 25 09_32_57 CDT 2000
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The career planner noted that although you were recommended for reenlistment in June You were recommended for reenlistment. the current CO recommended you for reenlistment and assignment of a RE-3C reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02198-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 1999. The career planner noted that although you were recommended for reenlistment in June 1991 by your previous CO, you were ineligible due to the four NJPs and should receive an RE-3C reenlistment code. The reenlistment code was assigned by the CO, not by the career planner.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03093-01
3093-01 15 October 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 11 October 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The fact...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04401-02
Since you were disqualified for assignment to recruiting duty, your request for reenlistment was denied. The reenlistment code a~e..gned was an RE-3C. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3C r code when Headquarters Marine Corps believes that a restrictive reenlistment code is required and no other reenlistment code fits the circumstances of the case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05882-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a more favorable reenlistment code than the RE-4 code now of record. supports the decision not to authorize reenlistment since he probably was not promotable with the nonjudicial punishment in However, the Board further believes that Petitioner the record. Accordingly, the Board concludes that the RE-4 The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05410-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by changing his reentry code issued on 29 April 2002, 2. However, he was not allowed to reenlist in the Marine Corps Reserve at the expiration of his enlistment due to his RE-4 reentry code. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 29 April 2002, he was assigned an RE-3C reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05669-08
At the time of separation, [he] was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4B, which indicates he was not recommended for reenlistment due to in-service drug involvement. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned an RE-3C reenlistment code on 19 January 2008, vice the RE-4B. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for the change in his record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4510 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-3C reentry code is authorized when a Marine is released from active duty and not recommended for reenlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4929 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-3C reentry code is authorized when a Marine is released from active duty, and is not recommended for reenlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09603-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code (RE-4) be changed. f. Enclosure (5) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps stating that based upon Petitioner's disciplinary infractions in 2006 he was correctly assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...