NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02161-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02175-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the applicable naval record be corrected by completely removing the fitness reports for 2 May to 31 October 2000 and 1 November 2000 to 22 January 2001, copies of which are at Tab A. “ongoing security investigation ” from the fitness report CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02178-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 14 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. 2 convicted by summary court-martial On 19 February 1980, you were of an unauthorized absence from 25 January to 29 January 1980, a failure to go to appointed place of duty; period of four days; missing ship's movement; The punishment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02182-02
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02183-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. of misconduct reenlistment code was denied based on your record and because you were serving in pay grade However, your request for a change in the E-2 after four years of Your record has been corrected to show an active service. YOU are now requesting that the record be corrected to show that you were not reduced in rate to pay grade E-2 one of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02188-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 2 188-02 3 April 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McPartlin, Pauling, and Harrison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and irijustice on 26 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02189-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP: yri ~ o c k e ; No: 2 189-02 19 June 2002 From: Chairn~an, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: ( 1 ) DD Form 149 w/attacli~nents (2) NPC memo 1780 PERS-604 of 17 May 2002 (3) Subject's naval record I. Pursirant to the provisions of reference (a), Su1,ject...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02190-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting considered your application on 17 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02193-02
that tlie applicable naval I-ecortl be corrected to estahlisli entitlct~ii~nt to a 7onc "('" Sc~lcctivc Kc'enlist~nc~it Ronus (SKR) for tlie IS ratins. o n I I .Iune 1002 and, pllrsunt to its regulations, deter-~iiinetl that tlie corrective action indicated below slio~~ltl Iw taken on tlie avaiL111le evidence of record. The Hoard, having reviewctl all tlie hcts ot' record pertaining to I'etitioner's allegations of error and i~i.justice, finds ;IS follou~s: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02196-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 May 2000, and the memorandum for the record dated 14 February 2001, copies of which are attached. Former Reference (b) requires that promotion selection essage, as was promotion boards and The Per reference (c), a lieutenant who has at least...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02196-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and Board. record further reflects that you were honorably discharged after the completion of your required active service on 18 September 1946. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02198-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve, vice being discharged on 31 December 2001 or any other date. However, the Board is aware that Headquarters Marine Corps has routinely recommended corrective action in similar cases when an individual is qualified for reserve retirement and there is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02199-02
the Board considered the advisory 30 May 2002, a copy of which of‘ is conscientious consideration of ‘ the entire recortl, the Board found that the est:tblish the existence of probable material error or After careful and evidence submitted injustice. The names and votes of ot’ your It is regretted that the circumstances You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. request to enroll in the eview of cord indicates...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02202-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that in the absence of the last performance evaluation, withholding your advancement and the nonjudicial punishment for a period of unauthorized absence were sufficient to support the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02204-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 J LP:ddj Docket No: 2204-02 3 April 2002 From: Chair~nan, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McPartlin, Pauling, and Harrison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 March 2002 and, pursi~ant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02208-02
mh MEH: Docket No: 2208-02 9 July 2002 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 Dear This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the IJnitetl States Code, section 1552. for correction of your naval record pursuant to the OI,I for accord;mce with A three-member panel of the Hoard session, considered your application were reviewed in proceedings of this application, together with applicable statutes, opinion...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02212-01
DC 20350.200 NAV Y N 0 S IN REPL” REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/OlU1176 2 Aug 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF OF FIREMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #02212-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation Fireman 1. Enlistment Bonus (EB). In accordance with than a 6 year obligor program must Enlistment for a peridd of The EB program is budgeted on quotas Navy Recruiting Command and the not, by the number of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02215-02
that tlie applicable naval record be corrected to estahlisli entitlelntvt to a /onc " A " Sclcclivc Kc~enlistnient Ronus (SKH) for the M A rating. )ocu~iie~itiiry ~iiateriill consitl~,~-etl records. The Board, 11;lving reviewctl all tlic l'acts ot' rcco~-tl pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and ili~jirstice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02218-02
officer recommended an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness. were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02220-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At the time of ; entry onto active duty in 1980, it would have been impossible for him to have been counseled an education assistance program that didn't exist until 1985. no one could have enrollment period, requirements of the VEAP to Montgomery GI Bill conversion opportunities that didn't...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02221-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The execution of all punishment was On 16 December 1985 you were advanced to first class petty officer (E-6) and on 21 July 1986 you extended your enlistment for a period of 27 months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02228-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Goldsmith, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02228-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TJR Docket No: 2228-02 19 September 2002 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02231-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02238-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 30 days, to On 3 August 1960 you received nonjudicial a $40 forfeiture of pay, and reduction on 6 May 1960, you were paygrade E-l. On 27 August and again on 8 October...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02240-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02245-01
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. c. We cannot administratively remove or change the fitness reports as Only the reporting senior who signed the original fitness report may material for file in the member ’s record. g. The fitness reports have been in the member ’s record for over four years.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02248-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Therefore, we can not recommend just adding 126 days active duty to his Statement of Service for his Naval Reserve Retirement Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN CASE OF unless we have documentation in order to support...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02256-01
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 8 11 of 18 October 2001 (3) Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record corrected to show he reenlisted and was automatically advanced under the provisions of Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02260-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TJR Docket No: 2260-02 25 September 2002 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02261-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02268-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. suspended on probation until 13 January 1949. received two nonjudicial punishments for disobedience, insolence and an unauthorized absence of one day. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02269-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 November 2002. You were convicted by general court-martial on 14 March 1955 of the offense of desertion, and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for one year and six months, total forfeiture of pay and allowances for that period, and to be discharged with a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02275-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. When he returned to active duty, SNM is a Navy Veteran who Per enclosure (1) His This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02277-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TRG Docket No: 2277-00 20 February 2001 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD 0 (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Petitioner had been retained on active duty as required by law, Since an she would have completed her service and been retired. This is consistent with the However, the Board notes .that if Board- § 1176 were applicable The Board notes the Therefore,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02279-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02279-02
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 From: To : Chair~iian, Board fijr ('orr-ection of Naval Rccortls Secretary of tlie Navy Re t': (a) Tillc I0 IJ.S.('. 1552 Encl : I'ursuant to tlie provisions of reference (a), Sul!ject lit.rei11at'lt.r referred to as Petitioner, I . filed enclosure ( I ) with this Roartl reqwsti~ig.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02281-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Sihj : REVIEW OF NAVAI, 1~1~(:01:1> Ret-: (a) ‘I’itl? The Board, Petitioner ’s allegations regulations, available evidence of enclosures, naval ~1 ot‘ consistin, 01‘ error that rem+. 3. of error The Board, and h;\ving iII.juslice, reviewed all finds the follo~5: as t;lcth 01‘ I-ccortl pcrt;lining to Petitioner ’s allegation s a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02284-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 J LP: yrj Docket No: 2284-02 18 June 2002 From: Chairlnan, Board for Correctiotl of Naval Kecortls To: Secretary of tlie Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECOKD Ref: (a) Title 10 1J.S.C:. 1552 Encl: ( 1 ) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) HQMC niemo 1040 MUV of 2 hlay 2002 (3) Sut?ject7s naval record 1. F'ursuant to the provisions of reference (a),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02285-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 5 April 2001 2285-01 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summar (3) Subject's naval record y From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02285-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2003. Although the Board voted not to file the supplemental report in your record without the required cover letter, you may submit this report to future selection boards. The report in question is a Periodic/Regular report.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02290-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. Unlike the VA, the military departments are permitted to assign disability ratings only in those cases where the service member has been found unfit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02301-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 hlEH:vri Ihcke; No: 230 l-02 9 July 2002 Ref: (a) Title IO 1J.S.C‘. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02303-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject ’s widow, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage, vice child only coverage. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02305-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The CO of the DETROIT responded that when you reported on board the RTC letter of 2 June 1986 was noted in your service record, but the ship was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02309-00
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. equests removal of two Chief Warrant Officer FY-99 and FY-0 He was considered as a below zone candidate by the s properly considered by erve Chief Warrant Officer, He was not selected by any of 3. the FY-98, (W-4) Promotion Selection Boards. Chief Warrant Officer p?, Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02311-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02319-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 23 19-02 3 April 2002 From : Chairnian, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McPartlin, Pauling, and Harrison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and i11.justice on 26 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that tlie corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02323-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Continuous Submarine Pay (CONSUB) entitlement.. 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. L....