DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
WMP
Docket No:
19 August 2002
2196-01
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 August 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
Your allegations of error and
procedures*applicable to the proceedings of this
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The record reflects that you
You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 23 May 1943 at age 17 for
the duration of World War II.
served without incident until 18 September 1945, when you were
convicted at a deck court of an unauthorized absence from 13 to
17 September 1945, a period of four days.
imposed was reduction in rank to private first class.
record further reflects that you were honorably discharged after
the completion of your required active service on 18 September
1946.
Additionally, you served on active duty between 26 June
1947 until 20 January 1950 and from 12 September 1950 until 11
September 1951, without any incidents of misconduct.
The punishment
The
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and
.
immaturity, the fact that it has been over 55 years since you
were discharged, and your contention that the deck court of 18
September 1945 never occurred.
although you contend that you never appeared before the deck
court and that you were not guilty of any misconduct, you have
provided no evidence to support this claim.
evidence to the contrary,
18 September 1945 was valid.
been denied.
will be furnished upon request.
the Board found that the deck court of
Accordingly, your application has
The names and votes of the members of the panel
The Board concluded that
Without any
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
it is important to keep in mind that
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04749-02
The punishment imposed was confinement for five days with You were sentenced to confinement for The On 4 February 1943, you received NJP for manufacturing and selling liberty passes and disrespect to a commissioned officer. The punishment imposed was confinement for five days with bread and water. On 15 March 1943 you were convicted by a SCM of a 22 day period of unauthorized absence, You were sentenced to a bad conduct discharge (BCD).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08861-08
2 three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In October 1945, you were processed for an administrative discharge by reason of convenience of the government.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808682
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 25 October 1945, you were convicted by a general court-martial of an eight day period of absence without leave and were sentenced to confinement for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10344-08
An average of 3.25 in conduct was required at the time of your separation for an honorable characterization of service. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, -honorable post military service, and desire to... upgrade your.discharge..- Nevertheless, the Board concluded these. for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04368-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Further, there is no indication that anyone aboard BETELGEUSE was wounded or injured during the incident of 6 or 7 April 1945. The foregoing is very significant since it tends to show that you were not injured or wounded as you contend or, even if you were, the injury was so minor that it...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10285-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05355-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Navy Board of Review affirmed the findings and Thereafter, you were not recom- On 30 April 1952 you received a third NJP for two periods of UA from 14-22 March and 29 March to 3 April 1952. bad conduct discharge on 5 May 1952. concluded that the foregoing factors and contentions...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06419-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late grandfather’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04698-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As a result of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR1422 15
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...