DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
WMP
Docket No:
28 August 2002
2221-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 28 August 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
Your allegations of error and
considered your
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You reenlisted in the Navy on 14 September 1983 for four years
as a petty officer second class (E-5) after four years of prior
naval service. The record reflects that you served without
incident until 7 August 1984,
punishment
imposed was forfeitures of $300 per month for two months and
reduction to
suspended for a period of six months.
(NJP) for wrongful use of marijuana.
when you received nonjudicial
The punishment
paygrade E-4.
The execution of all punishment was
On 16 December 1985 you were advanced to first class petty
officer (E-6) and on 21 July 1986 you extended your enlistment
for a period of 27 months.
Your record reflect: that you received an adverse enlisted
performance evaluation for the period of 1 December 1988 to 17
In this evaluation you received marginal marks
December 1989.
of 3.2 in initiative and 3.0 in reliability.
were not recommended for advancement or retention.
commanding officer stated that you performed satisfactorily, but
were not ready for advancement to chief petty officer. He
stated that your supervisory skills were weak, you lacked
initiative, and could not be depended upon due to your frequent
absences and tardiness.
Additionally, you
Your
On 13 December 1989, you received an honorable discharge due to
fulfillment of service obligation and were assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code.
However, the Board concluded that your reenlistment
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors such as your period of above
average prior service and your desire to again serve your
country.
code was justified based on the marginal performance documented
in the last evaluation, the NJP, and your self admitted
Furthermore, based on your admission of misconduct,
misconduct.
it would appear that you were fortunate to be discharged without
the additional stigma of another nonjudicial punishment or a
court-martial.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
it is important to keep in mind that
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03796-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. A review In this military bearing/character, and Your record further reflects that you received an adverse special enlisted performance evaluation for the period of 16 June to 12 November 2001 to document the removal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02529-02
A three-member panel -of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. you were not advanced to HN until 16 April 1989, which did not allow you much time to be advanced to HM3 prior to your release An RE-3R reenlistment code is not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00214-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Board found that these factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your service on release from active duty, given your disciplinary record and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05850-01
A You were marked 3.0 ("meets The reporting senior noted The evaluation for the period ending 15 July 2000 showed you were now promotable and meeting standards in all categories. discharged from your second enlistment, you had not advanced Therefore, you met the criteria for reenlistment when For the first reenlistment, an However, at the time you were 2 Since you The Board found beyond E-3 and were not recommended for advancement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04079-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 13 June 2001 as a petty officer second class (DK2; E-5). However,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00085-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 7 December 1989. The page 9 shows that in the evaluation for the period ending 7 December 1989, he was assigned marginal marks of 3.0 in the categories of reliability and personal behavior. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03128-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. concluded that a 33 day period of unauthorized absence was sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07482-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. During the period from 15 June 2001 to 15 June 2002 you received a series of adverse performance evaluations from different raters and reporting seniors.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02930-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The instruction states, in part, as follows: To satisfy professional growth criteria for the first reenlistment (including first enlistment in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07974-97
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 1993. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After an evaluation, the diagnosis was personality." The Board also noted the comments by the CO in which he stated that you attempted suicide in 1987 and again in 1990, and on 16 April 1992 you stated that you were going to...