Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02220-02
Original file (02220-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No:  
26 November 2002

2220-02

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 26 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
604*of 17 May 2002, a copy of which is
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers
attached.

Your allegations of error and

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has  been denied.  The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000

1780
PERS-604
17 May 02

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via :

Assistant  for  BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Ref:

(a) CNPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 26 Apr 02
(b) Title 38,
(c) Veterans Benefits and Health Care Improvement Act of

United States Code, Chapter 32

2000 (PL 106-419)

1.

The following is provided in response to reference (a):

a.

Recommend the Board den
in the Veterans Educational Ass
reference (b),
30 June 1985,
to 31 March 1987.
deadlines lost their eligibility.

VEAP was closed to new enrollments on
but reopened for five months from 28 October 1986

Members who did not enroll before these

equest to enroll
( VEA P). Per

subsequent

states if he had been properly counseled that
Id preclude him from.participating in any

education assistance program, he would have elected to
when afforded the chance.

At the time of

;

entry onto active duty in 1980, it would have been
impossible for him to have been counseled an education assistance
program that didn't exist until 1985.
no one could have
enrollment period,
requirements of the VEAP to Montgomery GI Bill
conversion opportunities that didn't occur until 9 October 1996
and 1 November 2001.

Also, d
counseled

further states if he had been afforded the
VEAP-

rate to the MGIB Program when other  

oP
eligible members were allowed, he would have done so.
been no opportunity for those like LT
participate in VEAP to enroll in the MGIB

Program.

who didn't

There has

d.

Notification of the open period and final closure of VEAP
was given the widest dissemination via NAVOP messages, Navy Times
articles and by placing a statement on the Leave and Earnings
Statements of active duty members for several months.
reference 
Program,
for waivers to the law to establish VEAP accounts.
Sailors are in this category.

(c) authorized VEAP participants to enroll in the   MGIB
those who never participated are petitioning the Board

Over 40,000

Now that

Subj

:

PERS-604's point of contact
2.
reached at (DSN) 882-4260 or (C

who can be

Branch (PERS-604)

1 Education Programs



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01975-03

    Original file (01975-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). As stated above, references (c) and (d) provided opportunities to "VEAP participants" not 'VEAP-era members. could convert VEAP eligibility to states he was never afforded the he learned of a period of time when was not d. Granting the petitioner's request will not guarantee the Department of Veterans Affairs will award VEAP or MGIB Program benefits since...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07937-01

    Original file (07937-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandu~n 1780 Pers 604 of l l January 2002, a copy of which is attached. c. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07306-01

    Original file (07306-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-niember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP. Members who initially entered active duty during the VEAP era were not eligible for MGIB Program enrollment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06603-02

    Original file (06603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opening a VEAP account prior to the legislated deadlines, he is not eligible for VEAP benefits or conversion to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04731-03

    Original file (04731-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (b), the educational benefit program available to servicemembers entering active duty for the first time from 1 January 1977 through 30 June 1985 was VEAP. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty servicemembers with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03684-02

    Original file (03684-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (b), VEAP was closed to new enrollments on Members 'who did not enroll before these request to enroll (VEAP).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02692-02

    Original file (02692-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I’EKS-604 tlic Board considered the advisory of‘ 24 May 2002, a copy of which is After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, naval record, the burden is on the applicant to Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV N A VY PERSONNEL C OMM AN D 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01263-02

    Original file (01263-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    application, together with al applicable statutes, regul opinion furnished by NPC attached. accordan with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the ocumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your aterial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory morandum 1780 PERS-604 23 May 2002, a copy of which is After careful and consci evidence submitted was tonne injustice. Notificatio was given the wides of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01712-02

    Original file (01712-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Eligibility for federal education benefit programs is determined by the member's initial entrance onto active duty other than for training. without enrollment in the MGIB Program, would have no education benefits.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06291-03

    Original file (06291-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (d) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment).