DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No:
10 January 2002
8325-01
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Subj
:
FORMER
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a)
10
U.S.C. 1552
Encl:
(1)
(2)
DD Form 149
Subject’s naval record
1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to
show that he was assigned a more favorable reenlistment code than the RE-4 code he
received on 20 April 2001.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner and Rothlein and Ms. Schnittman reviewed
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 January 2002 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice finds as follows:
.
’
’s allegations
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.
C.
Petitioner served in the Navy from 29 January to 20 April 2001, when he was
discharged with an entry level separation for failing to meet procurement medical standards
because of asthma. He received a reenlistment code of RE-4, as required by governing
directives.
d. BUPERSINST 1900.8 provides, in effect, that Sailors other than officer candidates
discharged for failing to meet procurement medical/physical standards will be assigned an
RE-4 reenlistment code. Those discharged because of Erroneous Entry (other) however,
RE-3E, in the discretion of the commanding officer.
may be assigned a code of RE-4 or
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes
that as there is no evidence that Petitioner had any performance problems or disciplinary
infractions during his period of service which would have warranted an RE-4 reenlistment
code, the assignment of that code is unjust.
In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 20 April 2001 he was
assigned a reenlistment code of
RE-3E, vice the RE-4 now of record.
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner
’s naval record.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
4.
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
fitting Recorder
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
5.
of the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08395-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WAsHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 6 February 2002 8395-01 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy FORME REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. committed any acts of misconduct during his enlistment, or performed his duties in an unsatisfactory manner, it would be in the interest of justice to assign him a reenlistment code RE-3E, which would permit him to apply for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06914-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-3, rather than the RE-4 code he received on 17 April 2001, and that his discharge be upgraded from “general [sic] to honorable”. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03031-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was assigned a reenlistment (RE) code more favorable than the RE-4 she received on 2 March 1999. d. SECNAVINST 1900.8 provides, in effect, that Sailors discharged for failing to meet procurement medical/physical standards will be assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. CONCLUSION: Upon...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07119-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JRE Docket No: 25 September 7119-02 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: Encl: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02745-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment code more favorable than the code of RE-4 he was assigned on 21 February 2001. . 3 The Board, consisting of Ms. Davies and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Schultz, reviewed bktitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04323-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 4323-01 20 July 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: Encl: FORMER REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, show that he was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-3, 18 December 1998. hereinafter referred to as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07160-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a more favorable reenlistment code than the RE-4 code he received on 22 March 1995. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner and Rothlein and Ms. Schnittman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00292-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board questing, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment (RF) code of RE-1, vice the code of RE-4 he received on 19 July 2000 2. He was discharged on 19 July 2000, for failing to meet medical/physical procurement standards because of a hearing loss. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08282-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment code other than the RE-4 code he received on 24 May 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Frankfurt and Pfeiffer, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 9 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04585-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a more favorable reenlistment code than the RE-4 code he received on 13 October 1998. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner and Rothlein and Ms. Schnittman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...