DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JLP: ddj
Docket No: 8349-00
12 June 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 12 June 2001.
Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 SER 4031086 of 4 May 2001, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
# EPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF
NAVAL OPERATIONS
’
2000 NAVY PENTAGO
N
‘-
.
’
WASHINGTON. D.C.
20350-2000
IN REPLY REFER TO
5420
Ser
N133D/
7
2001
FEB
ofi
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
RECORDS
Via:
Subj
Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)
E OF
Ref:
Encl:
7220.8OE
(a) SECNAVINST
Docket Number 08578-00
1.
Forwarded, recommending disapproval for back CONSUBPAY.
On 10 April 1997 Petty Officer
2.
submarine duty after disapproval of a medical
Reference (a),
submarine duty,
"SUBPAY shall not be authorized for any
section 9, states that
period during which an individual is medically disqualified for
submarine duty regardless of subsequent reinstatement".
and has never been reinstated.
as disqualified from
waiver to return to
Submarine qualification and reinstatement is not within my
3.
coanizance and I recommend that this issue be addressed to Naval
Personnel Command (Pers 403
Submarine Pay
Program Manager
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06973-01
30 October 2001 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNP memorandum 5420 Ser which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06273-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08243-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Year Submarine Career Screening Gate Submarine Service Entry Date CONSUBPAY stopped on 8 February 2002. Per reference (a), reached his Petty Officer The Enlisted Master Record his actual total TOSS is 68 months.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05186-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 Ser which is attached. reference (,a), entitlement to CONSUBPAY stops at this point for any submarine Sailor who did not have at least 72 months of TOSS upon reaching his 12 YRGT.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06118-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09586-04
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N13OD/05U0025 dated 5 January 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03731-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. January 1978. member's ADSD, or January 2004 for EAOS is now 13 months past his HYT date. -Ten of the fourteen ast his PRD are months additional obligated service beyond his HYT date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00858-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. San Diego, CA for shore duty with a Projected Rotation Date (PRD) of December 2005. lAW Ref(a) to maintain his CONSUBPAY eligibility, he needed to extend/reenlist through February...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07179-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory N133D1000270 of 8 October 2002, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. action that would have enabled him to return to sea until he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07085-00
PERS-833 recommends disapproving Petitioner ’s request to remove the letter which removed his name from the promotion board report. ” e. In correspondence attached as enclosure PERS-06L6, the NPC Office of Legal Counsel, has commented that they recommend favorable action on Petitioner ’s request to have removed from his permanent record all reference to the NJP which has been set aside, but do not recommend favorable action on his request to remove the contested letter. c. Reference (b)...