Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08354-00
Original file (08354-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JRE
Docket No: 8354-00
3 October 2001

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Subj:

FORMER
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a)

10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1)
(2)

DD Form 149
Subject’s naval record

._-
..-

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
1.
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to
show that he was separated or retired by reason of physical disability for an unspecified
emotional disorder.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Shy and  
allegations of error and injustice on 27 September
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,

Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner ’s

 

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice finds as follows:

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 31 August 1960 in grade E-l, and was advanced

to E-2 on 22 November 1960. On 5 April 1961, he was diagnosed as suffering from an
inadequate personality, manifested by ineffectiveness, lifelong history of unproductiveness
and inadequacy, inflexibility, and poor reaction to stress associated with some anxiety
symptoms, and was recommended for discharge by reason of unsuitability. In a letter dated
11 April 1961, his commanding officer (CO) recommended that he be discharged by reason
of unsuitability, with a general discharge.
or civilian offenses, or unclean habits, that no performance marks had been assigned, and
that Petitioner did not object to the proposed discharge.
conditions on 18 May 1961. On 21 August 1961, the Veterans Administration (VA) denied

The CO noted that there was no record of military

He was discharged under honorable

his request for service connection for the personality disorder and
On 3 July 2001, the VA denied his request for service connection
disorder.

alleged facial paralysis.
for a major depressive

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concluded that the
available evidence was insufficient to demonstrate that he was unfit for duty because of a
condition incurred in or aggravated by his naval service.
disorder may render a service member unsuitable for service, it is not considered
under the laws administered by the Department of the Navy or the VA.

It notes that although a personality
a.disability

 

Although Petitioner did not request that his discharge be upgraded to honorable, the Board
concludes that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
duties well enough to complete recruit training, and to be advanced to grade E-2, and he had
no record of misconduct.

It notes that he performed his

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner’s request for correction of his record to show that he was separated

or retired by reason of physical disability be denied.

b. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he was discharged on 18

May 1961, with an honorable discharge.

C. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be tiled in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures

5.
of the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

ti W. DEAN PFEIFFER

Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07702-00

    Original file (07702-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 23 October 1990, a Navy psychologist determined that Petitioner suffered from a severe, longstanding personality disorder, not otherwise specified, and recommended that he be considered for On 2 November 1990, Petitioner was administrative separation because of that disorder. CONCLUSION: In this regard, it notes that diagnoses of major depression and personality Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the available evidence insufficient to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08455-00

    Original file (08455-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he received a “medical discharge”, vice a discharge by reason of a personality disorder. The Board also concludes that although it is clear that Petitioner unsuitable for service because of the effects of the adjustment disorder, he was not unfit to perform the duties of his rate by reason of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04440-02

    Original file (04440-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was discharged because of a “medical disorder” rather than a personality disorder. The Board, consisting of Ms. Moidel and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Carlsen, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2947 13

    Original file (NR2947 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. In the alternative, that his general characterization of service be upgraded to honorable, RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed to RE-1, and receive full involuntary separation pay. Although Petitioner was medically diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, the DD Form 214 erroneously states that he was discharged by reason of a “PERSONALITY DISORDER”.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05440-00

    Original file (05440-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JRE Docket No: 5440-00 15 October 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was discharged under...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03363-01

    Original file (03363-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    3363-01 12 October 2001 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: Encl: (a) (1) (2) (3) 10 U.S.C.1552 DD Form 149 w/attachments Case Summary Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge than the general discharge issued on 21...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01972-08

    Original file (01972-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 01972-08 12 November 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his characterization be changed from a general...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01267-08

    Original file (01267-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51700 . ORE Docket No. 1267-08 3 November 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To; Secretary of the Navy REVIEW Subj: FORMER ARMac OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03504-11

    Original file (03504-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting an upgrade of his other than honorable (OTH) discharge, which was issued on 10 March 1969, to a general characterization of service. being administratively separated due to a personality disorder, their characterization of service should be honorable unless a general characterization of service is warranted. That Petitioner's naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07775-99

    Original file (07775-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    7775-99 10 March 1999 From: To: Subj: Chairman, Secretary Board for Correction of Naval Records of the Navy REVIEW OF _ NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on...