DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
JRE
Docket No.
5 April 2001
00779-01
Dear
r
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 29 March 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
and they were finalized on 19 August
You accepted those
You underwent psychiatric evaluation on 25 August 1998,
the Physical Evaluation
The Board found that on 9 July 1998,
Board made preliminary findings that your bilateral testicular
pain did not render you unfit for duty.
findings on 12 August 1998,
1998.
because of your suicidal ideation with plan.
you were upset because the mother of your son would not let you
see him, and you were disappointed over the findings of the
Physical Evaluation Board,
remain in the Marine Corps.
a personality disorder,
basis. The recommendation was approved,
discharged on 7 October 1998.
and recommended for discharge on that
and the fact that you would have to
You were diagnosed as suffering from
You indicated that
and you were honorably
The fact that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded you
disability compensation for testicular pain is not probative of
error or injustice in your case, because the VA made that award
without regard to the issue of your fitness for military service.
As your personality disorder rendered you unsuitable for service,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03379-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and injustice session, considered your application on 17 May 200 1. regu’.ations and procedures applicable to the were reviewed in accordance with administrative proceedings of this Board. The military departments, however, may rate only those conditions which render a service member unfit for duty, or which warrant a separate rating. condition was ratable at 30% or higher, or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057512C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Once a soldier is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05991-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2003. After reviewing the report of that examination on 14 April 2000, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) made preliminary findings that you were unfit for duty because of residuals of your cancer, which it rated at 0%. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01198
The examination was normal and mood was not specifically described. The NARSUM clearly noted that the MH symptoms were present prior to deployment as well as after, indicating the CI was “fit” to deploy. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for any of the contended conditions, so no additional disability ratings are recommended.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05183-99
__-.. ._ ’ , MSC, USN, dtd 21 Ott 98 found.the member fit for duty on - PEB Case File - Additional Medical Evidence - Service - Memo from - PRT Folder A medical board was held at on 14 January 1998 with diagnoses of: Chronic Low Back Pain (7242) 1. question is not whether the member's performance is "sub-optimal", but rather whether her performance meets required Navy standards. evaluations up through July 1997, which reflect that the member has always performed at or above standard.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03232-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were not discharged because of the effects of a recurrent hernia, as you now allege, but because of the effect of recurrent bilateral varicocele. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301150
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00903
ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB rated chronic left testicular pain as unfitting and provided a disability rating. He continued with groin pain much greater on the left than the right.At the MEB exam 10 March 2002(approximately 5 months prior to separation)the CI reported chronic scrotal pain rated 2 out of 10 at baseline but increasing to 8 out of 10 with strenuous activity. The Board additionally reviewed coding IAW §4.115b as 7518 (urethral stricture) when rating the left testicular pain...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02290-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. Unlike the VA, the military departments are permitted to assign disability ratings only in those cases where the service member has been found unfit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00289
Chronic Right Groin and Testicular Pain Condition . The physical examination noted no testicular masses or tenderness.The examiner diagnosed chronic right groin pain and right testicular painand stated that there was no clear explanation for the pain.Removal of the right testicle was discussed as a “last ditch effort.”The CI was given an L3 profile for chronic right groin and testicular pain with specific restrictions towards limiting physical activities.The commander’s statement indicated...