Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00837-01
Original file (00837-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 837-01
14 August 2001

This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER  
which is attached

In addition, the Board considered the advisory
852/369  of 2 May 2001, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE   NAVY

N AVY  PERSONNEL 
MILLINGTON TN  

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

COMMAND
3805x3-0000

1430
Ser 
2 May 01

$52/369

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

1

NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for   BCNR Matter (PERS-OOXCB)

Subj:

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS  

IN THE CASE OF

Ref:

Encl:

(a) BUPERSINST  

1430.16D

(1) BCNR File 

#00937-01

1.
(a),

Based on policy and guidelines established in reference
enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

has asked his rating  

2.
to
(a) to make this change.
have been reviewed and no mention of the Boatswain Mate
rating is made.
 

There are no prov
Additionally,

No relief is recommended in this

be changed from Coxswain

ference
records

case.

By direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01893-01

    Original file (01893-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07239-01

    Original file (07239-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 81 attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06744-01

    Original file (06744-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 11 of 7 December 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03964-01

    Original file (03964-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 3964-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. l~iinel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive A three-member session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01153-01

    Original file (01153-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04747-01

    Original file (04747-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02186-01

    Original file (02186-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 85/461 of 12 June 2001, a copy of opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11913-08

    Original file (11913-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner is requesting to not be paid her $1,000.00 Enlistment Bonus Source Rate (EBSR} and the $5,000.00 Enlistment Bonus College Credit (EBCC) and cancel her 12 month agreement to extend.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04327-01

    Original file (04327-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Office relief is recommended in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01398-01

    Original file (01398-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...