Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00831-01
Original file (00831-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

 

THI: NAVY
 

NlrVAL  RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC

 

20371-5100

“-

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 831-01
30 May 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material 
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
additilon, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 
attached.

corsidered by the Board consisted of your

In 

PE.RS 8 15 of 1 May 2001, a copy of which is

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error 

cr injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF 
5720 INTEGRITY 

THli NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
DRIVE

MlLl.lNCTON  TN 

28055-0000

1160
PERS-815
01 May 01

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

PERS-OOZCB

BCNR PETITION ICO

SNM's  DD Form 149 dtd 10 Jan 01

(a) 
(b)  NAVADMIN  
(c) OPNAVINST  

180/97
1160.6A

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

a.

The petitioner reenlisted on  

years to continue active service.
time of reenlistment was 07 June 1998.

recommend disapproval of the

112  February 1998 for two

The petitioner's EAOS at the

b.

The petitioner request a zone 

-A"  SRB entitlement for the

DT(8752) rate/NEC that qualifies her for the two year reenlistment
of 12 February 1998.

C .

Reference (b) released on 25 
rate/NEC  on the SRB award 

DT(8752) 
reference (c),
eligibility is three years.

the minimum obliserve  

rlequirement  for SRB

J.11~  1997, did not list the

levIa  list.

Additionally, per

In view of the above,

2.
the same.

recommend 

th'a  petitioner's record remain

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the

3.
Board for Correction of Naval
is returned.

R

Enclosure (1)

t Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99

    Original file (00120-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00311-07

    Original file (00311-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    311-07 14 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.ncerely,W. This is an advisory...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00896-01

    Original file (00896-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. petitioner's Executive Officer denied the request for NEC 2735. reference (c) does not indicate if NEC 2735 was e. PERS-815 does not have the authorization to determine the petitioner's eligibility for NEC 2735 upon the release of reference (b).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03457-01

    Original file (03457-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08169-00

    Original file (08169-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend expunging the petitioner's Recommend effecting a This change Subj: BCNR PETITION IC This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03083-01

    Original file (03083-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and injustice session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 26 June is attached. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use recommend the petitioner's record In view of the above, only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01519-01

    Original file (01519-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98

    Original file (08446-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03207-01

    Original file (03207-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 1 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10181-07

    Original file (10181-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/093 dtd 23 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...