NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00451-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This provision allows a member section 741(d) (3) only We recommend Lieutena 3. transferring to the IRR i FY-02 Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00455-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 455-01 13 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00466-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 November 2001. The fact that the VA has rated the foot condition at 20% is not probative of the existence of error or injustice, because the VA assigns ratings without regard to the issue of fitness to perform military duties. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00471-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board believed that a record which includes two nonjudicial punishments, several counseling entries, and an alcohol related incident after...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00474-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00474-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 474-01 15 February 200 1 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a)' Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00477-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. present your case...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00480-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TRG Docket No: 480-01 25 October 2001 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD OF (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: .Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00493-01
On 5 November 1974 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of a 22 day period of UA and were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 30 days and a $200 forfeiture of pay. Subsequently, the discharge authority directed an 4 other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, and on 27 The February 1975 you were so discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. and your contentions that you could use of alcohol and drugs, and The Board further considered your The Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00508-01
to duty were denied and you received the bad conduct discharge on 27 September 1962. The Board concluded that there was no connection between the hepatitis and the offenses which resulted in your conviction and discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00513-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the corrected to establish entitlement to a zone DT rating (NEC 8708). Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 0054-01
1552 Encl : F:orm 149 w/attachments (1) DD (2) CNO memorandum 5420 N (3) Subject ’s naval record 130D l/O 1 U 1175 of 2 August 2001 Pursuant to th#E provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Special Duty Assignment Pay (SDAP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Caron, and Ms. Madison, reviewed 5 September 2001 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00549-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 29 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00552-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. summary court-martial of possession of marijuana. by the discharge authority, approved and you were discharged under other than honorable conditions on 1 September 1982.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00566-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 9 April 1970 you received nonjudicial punishment for treating a noncommissioned officer with contempt and disrespect. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00568-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. commissioned as an officer. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00571-00
refrigerator first, the other individual who was unable to provide a full sample placed the bottle in the refrigerator after him. stated that you had not used LSD. map" for the commanding officer's use in deciding However, the February 1992 issuance of Navy When it was issued with OPNAVINST The Board concluded that since the CO did not have (NA.VADMIN) "road the appendix was clearly designed to The Board believed that the urinalysis was conducted in accordance with regulations and was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00571-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), the legal guardian of Subject’s children, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his status was changed from Midshipman to active duty in his prior enlisted rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Neuschafer, and Ms. Davies, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00574-01
A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00579-01
You requested that your reenlistment code be changed from "RE-3" to "RE-1" (the Marine Corps has neither code). It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has changed your reenlistment code to RE-3C (when directed by CMC or when not eligible and disqualifying factor is not covered by any other code). A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 April 2002.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00588-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. all the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00593-01
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N of which is attached. N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer 2. petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) . In his Id requests favorable action as disenrolled from he Electronics EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the Members who fail to complete basic including failure to graduate from and who do not continue in the skill for which The Navy offers an 4. discretion of recruiters and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00595-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative' regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your record reflects that on 25 October 1956 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of a two day period of unauthorized absence You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 15 days and a $30 forfeiture...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00596-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 24 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings .of this Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00598-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00605-01
A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board believed given the serious nature of the offense for which NJP was imposed within the last month of your enlistment, it is unlikely that you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00611-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the reenlistment executed on or about 4 May 2000 is for a term of 2 years, vice 4 years. The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00611-99
Your military record shows that on 30 July 1971 you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for two periods of unauthorized absence Your record also shows that prior to totalling 44 days. On 20 September 1977 the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) changed the characterization of the discharge to general under the provisions of the Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00622-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00634-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 26 September 1990. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's b. naval record. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00640-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to enlistment in a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 03 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00641-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 1 May 2001, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00647-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. Since you were treated no differently than others discharged under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00651-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the 7 April 1993 nonjudicial punishment (NJP) and the Administrative Remarks (page 11) entries of 19 April 1993 and 23 October 1996. The opinion recommends removal of the entries documenting the NJP of 7 April 1993, based on the CO's action of 8 January 2000. In summary, the minority believes that the NJP and the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00658-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. PERS- If 832 find the member ’s petition has merit, we have no objection to the removal of the performance evaluation in questio Head, Performance Evaluation Branch DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 5720 INTEDRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 5420 PERS-832C 26 Apr 01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00666-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD:hd Docket No: 00666-01 15 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: LCDR Sq iiaiiiiiinibee ssc, US REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00667-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 667-01 11 September 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone 3364. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00676-01
A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2001. You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for two months, forfeitures of $50 per month for two months, and a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00679-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment bonus (SRB) for the AD rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00696-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to Petitioner was entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for his place of residence. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Kastner, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00697-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlistment member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (a) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge than the general discharge issued on 5 June 1973. He received a general discharge upon fulfillment of his service obligation on 5 June 1973. e. Regulations provide that individuals discharged by reason of expiration of enlistment will receive the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00703-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to enlistment in a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00708-01
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The record reflects that you Punishment imposed was a You served without On 24 March 1954 you were convicted by civil authorities of possessing and furnishing narcotics. The Board concluded that the foregoing factors and contentions were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00709-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your military record shows that on 17 March 1975 you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for unauthorized absences totalling 79 days and violation of a lawful general regulation. Further, the Board concluded that you received the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00709-01
b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner. However, the Board notes that even if she does not have a personality disorder, she was still having difficulties that should be considered in any future security clearance determination. warranted, the Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the circumstances which led to her discharge on 13 May 1999, and the rationale for the Board's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00715-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the error or injustice. You assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code The Board noted your regret for the mistakes which led that your actions did not Regulations require the to individuals separated by reason of entry...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00719-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy LCC:ddj Docket No: 719-01 21 February 2001 . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlisted in paygrade E-2. The Board, consisting of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00722-01
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an other than honorable discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00723-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00745-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Neuschafer, Frankfurt, and Ms. Davis, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...