DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 894-01
7 November 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 October 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that on 8 December 1997, the Physical Evaluation Board determined that
you were fit for duty, despite your bilateral knee condition. That finding was reconsidered
and affirmed on 7 January 1998, and you were advised of the reconsidered finding by letter
dated 21 January 1998. You were discharged from the Navy 18 February 1998, without any
objection from you, because of a condition, not a disability, interfering with your
performance of duty. You were assigned a reenlistment code of
governing directives.
RE-3G, as provided for in
As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty, or that you were improperly
assigned the RE-3G reenlistment code, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective
action in your case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03484-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. questioned the authority of seniors all of which were inconsistent On 11 August 2000 the GCMCA reviewed your case and directed an honorable discharge and assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment code. While Marine Corps regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3P reenlistment code to Marines...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07388-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Subsequently, you were diagnosed with a severe At that time you Based on the diagnosed personality disorder, you were processed for an administrative discharge. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03806-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05480-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 April 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02344-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02344-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5410 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof,-your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a condition, not a disability would normally be assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02887-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09956-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2008. Based on the information currently contained in your record it appears you remained on active duty until you were discharged under honorable condition for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, and assigned an RE-3G reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00084-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 October 2010. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.