NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04091-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2000. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 1 June 2000, a copy of which is attached. Reference (b) is the performance evaluation directive 161O.llC, the Performance Evaluation Review Board, met on 4 May 2000 to consider Staff petition contained in reference (a).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04093-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 4093-01 25 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade.. 2. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04097-01
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The psychologist believed that this condition would Thirteen Based on this recommendation, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04098-00
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Leeman, and Mazza, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 July 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board concluded CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, (2), the Board finds the existence of an contents of enclosure following corrective action. and especially in light of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04100-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2000. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 1 June 2000, a copy of which is attached. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04101-01
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Series of Documents (3) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his accrued leave balance be credited with an additional 25 days of accrued leave to compensate him for leave lost during consecutive overseas assignments. The Board, consisting of Messrs....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04108-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. aim that "By doctor's orders Subj: SE OF GUNNERY SMC SERGEAN d. Gunnery Sergeant was required to be notified by MC0 6100.10. her commander that she has been assigned to the weight control program per Documented evidence enclosed in her application, the CO, Headquarters and Service Battalion letter 6100/l B 07-03 dated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04109-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE: NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2037C’-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 4109-01 1 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Zsalman, and Pfeiffer allegations of error and injustice on 30 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04110-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Kef: (a) Encl : (1) (2) (3) L)ocket No: 4 I IO-01 39 Novelnher 200 1 Petitioner recwrtl be , I’otitioner’s RECOMMENDATION: Docket No: 41 lo-01 That Petitioner ’s naval record 1 July 2000 is in Ix~ygratlc 3 ETYE4 effective 12 J~IIW Iw corrected, and the t:3 200 I furlher corrected to tlatc’ he completed appropriare, show 13’ “A” that show to atlvarlcernent to sclm~l. where the enlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04113-01
The punishment imposed was a $176 forfeiture of On 21 August 1991 you received NJP for a day of unauthorized absence pay and restriction and extra duty for 14 days. However, the Board concluded these factors and Accordingly, your application has been Given all the circumstances of your case, NJPs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04114-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded your discharge and reenlistment code were proper as issued and no change is warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04117-01
1552 DD Form 149 w/attachments Series of Documents Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be , which , from 27 November 2000 to 3 January 2001 1) with this Board requesting, ( 36 days retlected as annual leave be corrected to show regular duty vice annual 1. filed enclosure corrected to show that the were erroneously leave. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04118-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04119-00
Pursuant to reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed an application at enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected to show the date of rank and effective date in the grade of captain he would have been assigned had he been selected to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 1997 Reserve Captain Selection Board, vice the FY 1998 Reserve Captain Selection Board. The date of rank on his commission is 9 July 1997, the date of rank he had as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04125-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner accepted his reserve appointment on 1 November 1999. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Harrison, Morgan, and Whitener, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 October 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04126-01
S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TJR Docket No: 4126-01 21 November 2001 Dear w This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04133-01
Copies of RFC documents appearing in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) are at Tab B. removal of the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 17 April 1996, a copy of which is at Tab C, as he says it resulted from the fitness report. He provides his rebuttal of 17 April 1996 to the page 11 entry, and he states that he does not know why it is not in his record. The Board for Correction of Naval Records disapprove request for removal of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04135-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. and especially in light of the injustice warranting the Docket No: 4135-01 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner was authorized BAH 13...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04136-01
hereinafter, referred to as Petitioner, this Board requesting, in effect, record be corrected to show he was entitled to full separation pay when he was discharged from the Marine Corps on 21 November 2000. that the applicable naval filed enclosure (1) with The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Harrison, and 2. Petitioner asserts that his request to reenlist was not processed properly by his command or Headquarters CMC, MMEA-6. Because the request was overtaken by events MMEA-6 The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04137-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the MT rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04138-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04140-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 6 November 1980 you received NJP for absence from your appointed place of duty and were awarded a $125 forfeiture of pay and restriction and extra duty for 14 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04142-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show he accepted his commission in the Naval Reserve on 31 March or 1 April 2000, to reflect no break in service after he left active duty on 31 March 2000. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ensley, Schultz and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 August 2000, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04143-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04144-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in a higher paygrade.. 2. The Board, consisting of Beckett, Pfeiffer, and Whitenen, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken evidence of record. tinds the existence of an injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04146-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04147-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the STG rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04149-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 15 December 1998. Schnittman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04154-01
months later, on 2 and 9 May 1967, you received NJP for a two day period of unauthorized absence (UA) and breaking restriction. Approximately five Your record further reflects that on 16 January 1968 you were convicted by SPCM of four periods of UA totalling 155 days. Board concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant a correction of your naval record given your seven periods of UA totalling 166 days and your three periods of confinement which that your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04163-01
However, given the circumstances, especially his fine performance of duty, the Board concludes that an RE-1 reenlistment code should be assigned in this case as an exception to policy. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 24 July 2000 he was assigned an RE-1 reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04165-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his enlistment documents pertaining to enlisstment of 10 November 1997 will reflect that he was married and he was entitled to Basic Allowance for Quarters-DIFF (BAQ-DIFF). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Lightle, and allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04168-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04169-01
They also considered your counsel's letters dated 25 June 2001 with enclosures, 25 July 2001 with enclosure, and 23 March 2002. For us to recommend relief, the petitioner has to show that either there is no rational support for the reporting senior's action or that the reporting senior acted for an illegal or improper purpose. In this case, the reporting senior makes it clear in references (b) and (c) and his endorsement to the member's statement his reason for submitting the reports as they did.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04170-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. authorized by regulation, than others in your situation, The reenlistment code may be waived and enlistment Since you have the least restrictive code and a need exists for an individual and have been treated no differently the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04172-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and sub.mitted in support thereof, your pclicies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04175-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04176-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. While the request is not in your record, it is presumed that you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order It is to avoid trial by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04179-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 8 August 2000 4179-O From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: SG REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD USMC Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04180-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. completed six semester hours of college.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04188-00
The disc condition was rated on a presumptive basis, i.e., it was diagnosed and found to be 10% or more disabling within one year of your discharge from the Navy. The Board noted that the military departments rate only those conditions which render a member unfit to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating at the time of his separation or retirement, whereas the VA rates any condition it classifies as “service connected”. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04189-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner ’s travel to Guam was authorized and not government directed. The Board, consisting of Pfeiffer, Shy, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner error and injustice on 21 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04192-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code‘when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04194-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone AC rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Pfeiffer, and Whitener, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 2 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04195-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone AMH rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04197-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. THE $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF A GTEP 2. WITH COMMAND INVOLVEMENT VIA GTEP RECRUITS SHOULD RETURN TO WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04199-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04199-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 CRS Docket No: 4199-01 21 June 2001 Dear This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04200-01
_ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04202-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04203-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in paygrade ET21E5. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Taylor, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and...