DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
TRG
Docket No:
25 October 2001
4097-01
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 23 October 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insu,fficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 14 June 2000 at age 17.
days later you were diagnosed with a borderline personality
disorder.
adversely affect your future potential for performance of duties,
and recommended your separation from the Navy.
The psychologist believed that this condition would
Thirteen
Based on this recommendation, you were processed for an
administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment. In
connection with this processing,
procedural rights.
directed an entry level separation and you were so separated on
11 July 2000.
you elected to waive your
Subsequently, the separation authority
You state in your application that you wanted to be separated
from the Navy because your girlfriend was pregnant.
now discovered that she was not pregnant and desire to reenlist.
You have
Regulations allow for the assignment of an RR-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is separated because of an erroneous
enlistment, and such a code is normally assigned when an
individual is separated based on a diagnosed personality disorder
prior to completing recruit training.
Since you have been
treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board
could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the
RE-4 reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00574-01
A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06345-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. was not pregnant and now want to reenlist in the Navy. Subsequently, you found out she Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged based on a diagnosed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02015-01
In connection with this processing, you were processed for Subsequently, the You state in your application that you wanted to leave recruit training so that you could solve some personal problems. is separated prior to completing recruit training after being diagnosed with a personality disorder that interfered with the ability to perform military duties. no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01863-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were so discharged on 15 May 2000 and assigned and waived the right to Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. Since you have been treated no differently than others discharged under similar...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02119-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. than others separated for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09607-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 20 December 2000 at age 29 after being granted a medical waiver for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04688-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Prior to separation, you acknowledged On 8 November 2000, the separation You were so separated Since you have been treated no differently than Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02949-01
You state but you asserted that you Subsequently, the Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals, discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. differently than others discharged under similar circumstances, the board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07151-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. than others separated for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01349-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TRG Docket No: 1349-01 11 July 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...