Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04108-01
Original file (04108-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

BJG
Docket No: 4108-01
24 October 2001

SMC

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 24 October 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated
29 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. They also considered your undated rebuttal letter
with enclosures.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. The information you provided to support your contention of
harassment did not persuade them that the contested placement on weight control was
unjustified. They found enclosures (1) through (3) to your letter did not apply to the weight
control assignment at issue, from 23 May to 16 December 1997. They were unable to find
that you met Marine Corps standards when you were placed on weight control on
23 May 1997, nor could they find that you were retained after you had met your
requirements. In view of the above, your application has been denied. The names and votes
of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

NAW
HEADGUARTERS  UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

DEPARTMENT OF THE

 

3280 RUSSELL ROAD

GUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103

IN REPLY REFER TO:

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

RECORDS

Subj:

OF GUNNERY

SERGEAN

C

1.
Gunnery Sergeant
documents has been r
of the weight control entry from the Marine Corps Total Force
System (MCTFS) record.

pplication  with supporting  
cerning  her request for removal

-

MC0 6100.10, Weight Control and Military Appearance, sets

2.
forth guidance and administrative procedures for the assignment
to weight control and/or military appearance program if a Marine
has been determined to be overweight or their physical appearance
does not meet acceptable Marine Corps standards by a medical
evaluation.

3.

The following comments/opinions are provided:

a.

Gunnery 

s required to receive a
from an appropriate

Sergean
command directed medical
credentialed health care provider prior to her assignment to the
weight control program per  
enclosed in her application,
6100 CAOO, indicates that on an unspecified date, appropriate
credentialed health care provider recommended a six month waiting
period was necessary for her complete medical treatment before
starting a weight loss plan.

the undated FIRST ENDORSEMENT letter

Documented evidence

MC0 6100.10.

b.

Documented evidence enclosed in Gunnery Sergeant
Standard Form 600 dated 24 September 1996 a

application,
November 1996, indicates that she did receive two seperate
medical evaluations from an appropriate credentialed health care
provider as required by  

MC0 6100.10.

C .

Gunnery Sergeant

I was not to be placed on a weight program." is not supported by
documented evidence enclosed in her application.
She had an
appointment scheduled on 20 May 1997 with the Military Medicine
Department concerning her weight evaluation, however, she does
not include a completed SF 600 for that appointment which would
contain the results of that evaluation.

aim that

"By doctor's orders

Subj:

SE OF GUNNERY  
SMC

SERGEAN

d.

Gunnery Sergeant

was required to be notified by

MC0 6100.10.

her commander that she has been assigned to the weight control
program per 
Documented evidence enclosed in her
application,
the CO, Headquarters and Service Battalion letter
6100/l  B 07-03 dated 23 May 1997 meets the requirements set forth
in
documentation to report information in the MCTFS per  
P1080.40, Marine Corps Total Force System Personnel Reporting
Instructions Manual  

Also, this letter is the required supporting

MC0 6100.10.

(MCTFSPRIM).

MC0

e .

Gunnery 

Sergean
FS record reflects that she
was assigned to the weig
ogram 23 May 1997, well
beyond the recommended six month waiting period to allow her to
complete her medical treatment.

f.

Gunnery 

Sergean

uccessfully completed her

assignment to the weight control program on 16 December 1997 and
was removed from the program per  

MC0 6100.10.

9.

Documents contained in Gunnery  

Sergea

application supports the fact that her comman
administrative procedures set forth in  

MC0 6100.10.

ow all

4 .

In view of the above,

it is recommended that:

a.

The Board for Correction of Naval Records disapprove

Gunnery Serge
program 
infor

equest to remove the weight control
e MCTFS.

b.

If the Board for Correction of Naval Records finds that
Gunnery 
Sergea
records are in error or an injustice
was committed,
weight control program information from
the MCTFS.

5.

Manpower Management Information Systems Division defers

t of contact

Manpower Management Information
Systems Division

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03527-02

    Original file (03527-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be (MCTFS) entry reflecting his corrected by removing the Marine Corps Total Force System placement on weight control from 15 January to 5 May 1997. + ,y ,y i -* MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF GUNNERY USMC SERGEANT Encl: ( 1 )...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06887-01

    Original file (06887-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) entries reflecting his assignment to the weight control program on 12 May 1998 and his removal on 8 June 1998. removed from the program on 19980608. e. Staff Sergean the weight unit diary entry, officially assigned to the weight control...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03738-02

    Original file (03738-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    petitioner's assignment to the Military Appearance Program was correctly included on the fitness reports. As with Report A, the adversity of Report B was that he was assigned to the Military Appearance Program. rmance Evaluation Review Board Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROA D QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-510 3 MEMORANDUM FOR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06143-01

    Original file (06143-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 la (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 10 March 1998. Staff Sergean not assigned to the w 6100.10. and 980301 through 98103'0 do not a e. Upon the completion of enclosure (4) to MC0 6100.10, a page MC0 11 entry is authorized...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07592-01

    Original file (07592-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 7 November 2001, a copy of which is attached. Staff Sergeant command directed medic credentialed health care provider prior to his assignment to the weight control program per Lacking such documentation in his application, we cannot determine that an evaluation was conducted_ an opinion whether or not his commander erroneously assigned him to the weight control program. 19940823 and then...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00391-01

    Original file (00391-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing all references to his placement on the weight control program from 17 August 1990 to 1 September 199 1, to include the following entries in the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS): “WEIGHT CONTROL STATUS: 3 RE FRM WT CNTL [remove from weight control]” and “WEIGHT CONTROL DATE: 19900817.” A...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05789-00

    Original file (05789-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 1 March 2001 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached. Sergea MCTFS records has the appearance that he was extended on the program when his commander reported another weight control program entry for a period of 19930225 through 19940105. to grant a one time six month extension if satisfactory progress has not been made. VIRGINIA 221346103 IN REPLY REFER...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03823-03

    Original file (03823-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MCTFS and medical records supports her commander's action that appears to have followed appropriate administrative procedures when she was assigned to the weight control program on 19970818. The ACHCP commented on her medical The information recorded to her However, the Marine Corps Subj: SE OF CORPORA b. It may be possible that an entry was entered in her medical records to support her initial assignment, not available in her application.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08592-00

    Original file (08592-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Marine Corps Training and Education Command, dated 26 February 2001 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached. According to Master Sergeant TR, these weight recordings took place "after" he was officially removed (on 3 November 97) from the Weight Control Program, and therefore are irrelevant to this review. ates that he is concerned that nt could affect his promotion to After careful review of the supporting n...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03973-01

    Original file (03973-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lg (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 12 July 1999. (5), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page llg (“Adarministrative...