DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 4138-01
26 July 2001
Your allegations of error and
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 July 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 25
October 1991 at age 19.
1992.
that tested positive for marijuana.
commanding officer directed your separation.
August 1992 you received an entry level separation by reason of
enlisted in error.
code of RE-4.
The Board noted that applicable regulations require the
assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are
separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of
drugs.
injustice in your reenlistment code.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You reported to active duty on 4 August
On 5 August 1992 you submitted to an accession urinalysis
Subsequently, on 20
At that time you were assigned a reenlistment
The Board thus concluded that there is no error or
On 14 August 1992 the
Accordingly, your
The names and votes of the members
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08549-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that your nonjudicial punishment only eight days before your release from active duty, resulting in a reduction in rate, was sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02987-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. marks assigned for the period 1 February 1992 to 25 July 1992 are not entered on the page 9. In addition, the page 9 clearly shows that you were not eligible for reenlistment on 25 July 1992. that your performance either...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01038-01
in-charge (OINC) recommended to the discharge authority that you be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation. of your scheduled active duty for training and had sufficient time to make arrangements for child care, but you did not make the unit aware of problems until after your missed a drill and the period of active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06836-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings -of this Board. in the Marine Corps without prior approval of the Commandant of You were I the Marine Corps. composite score 0 1993 promotion 1992 in his PM0 promotion to co not have the re service record indicates that he had a or the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00062-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 CRS Docket No: 62-01 22 February 2001 - Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is required by regulatory guidance and must be assigned to individuals separated due to alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. The Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07822-00
you exercised poor judgment and immaturity in the handling of your financial affairs, been involved in two incidents of The reporting senior noted that during this period Your performance as an EW2 However, the domestic violence, and failed your semi-annual physical readiness test. discharged on 24 March 2000 with an You were not recommended for retention and were honorably RX-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06700-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 25 February 1993 you received your fourth NJP for absence from your appointed place of duty and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01420-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2001. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 25 October 1988. separation physical examination on 3 June 1992. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07126-00
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated in pay grade Accordingly, E-l following an extended period of active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00692-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of...