Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04192-00
Original file (04192-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370.5100

CRS
Docket No: 4192-00
21 June 2001

Your allegations of error and

Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 June 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 3 March 1998 at
age 19.
punishments.
possession and use of hallucinogenic mushrooms.
On 20 December 2000 an administrative discharge board recommended
that you be separated with a general discharge by reason of
After review by the discharge
misconduct due to drug abuse.
authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you
were discharged with a general discharge on 24 January 2001. At
that time you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code‘when an individual is discharged due to
misconduct.
clearly indicates that you committed misconduct by using drugs.
Since you have been treated no differently than others in your
situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the
assignment of your reenlistment code.

The record reflects that you received two nonjudicial

The offenses included dereliction of duty, and

In this regard, the Board noted that the record

Accordingly, your

since you did not ask for such

The names and votes of the members

application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service should be changed,
considertion and you have not exhausted your administrative
remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to 
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

You are entitled to have the

al:1 official records.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00607-01

    Original file (00607-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05440-01

    Original file (05440-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04971-00

    Original file (04971-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03004-01

    Original file (03004-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03350-02

    Original file (03350-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05238-01

    Original file (05238-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 29 November 2000 the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10245-02

    Original file (10245-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation was approved and on 1 June 2001 you received an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00505-03

    Original file (00505-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2003. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03007-06

    Original file (03007-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 September 2001. After review by the discharge...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04338-01

    Original file (04338-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When informed of the recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. The record reflects that you received nonjudicial conducted on 5 February 1988, diagnosed you with a A psychiatric At that time you were assigned Since you have been treated no differently than Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a...