NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03835-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 16 November 1982 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of a 15 day period of UA, absence from your appointed place paygrade E-l, a $500 of duty,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03841-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. b. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to There was no requirement In some cases, enroll or decline...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03842-01
There is no documentation of symptoms of depression, alcohol abuse, or any other psychiatric disorder. It is unlikely that symptoms of a post-traumatic stress disorder or major depressive disorder would have "caused or significantly contributed to the misconduct of record." In summary, it does not appear that this individual's diagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder and depressive disorder were symptomatic during his period of service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03843-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing for designated location of dependents. Humberd, Newman, and Mr. Bartlett, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03845-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 11 October 2000 384500 From: To: S&j: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy ASA REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03849-01
3849-01 12 October 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 11 October 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. incident...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03851-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03854-01
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. the discharge authority directed a general discharge by reason of He stated that the Navy had invested consider- fraudulent entry. determining what your true statement is, the governor of your state or the one you made while at the service school.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03856-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. applicant's request to reenlist as an (21, Per references (a) AME3/E-4 Applicant was This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03857-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. offenses warranting disciplinary action and it was certainly within the commanding officer's discretion to impose NJP for those offenses. evidence is available, it appears that the reduction in grade was The Board concluded that the commanding officer did Concerning the reduction to PFC, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03857-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the corrected to establish entitlement to a zone ETS W rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03861-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03862-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. When informed of the recommendation, you elected to waive your right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03862-01
On 15 August 1993 you were notified that action was being initiated to discharge you for misconduct due to drug abuse. Thereafter, the battalion commander concurred with the On 28 October You were On 16 June 1997 the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) denied your request for an upgrade of your discharge. Board also noted that when the CO notified you were being processed for discharge, recommend a general discharge under other than honorable However, there is no such characterization and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03866-01
Documentary material considered by the Board ’consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory a copy of which is NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 6 July 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03869-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlisted in paygrade E-5. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Lightle, and allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03871-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse under the insurable interest category, and then elected former spouse coverage under the spouse category. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03872-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 15 August 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03877-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 PERS attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03878-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03882-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03886-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority Thereafter, You did not You were The fact that you did not receive The Board noted your contention to the effect that you During classification interviews in recruit it is determined whether an individual is qualified for "A" school, even though you had and as a result...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03894-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2001. become effective until 1 May 2000, LCD consideration under the new program. strange, in that all officers whose promotions are delayed due to failure of physical readiness tests are retained on active duty until they pass the test or twice fail to select for promotion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03895-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2000. Recommend the Board deny STS3 equest to add Reference Navy College Fund (NCF) Program enlistment guarantee to his master record. enlistment bonus are not eligible for the NCF Program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03896-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03905-01
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 5 July 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Since, of his DD Form 2057 by contributing a s recommend denial of 'was not able to provide a complete copy indicating he attempted to enroll in VEAP per month from his pay, we @quest to be enrolled in VEAP.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03908-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner,, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 21 August 1964. CONCLUSION: Based upon Petitioner's overall record of service and Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03914-01
.the Board for Correction of Naval A three-member panel of Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The record clearly shows that you were discharged on 15 March 2001 with an honorable discharge by reason of your admission to homosexual activities. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03919-01
You requested that your reenlistment code of RE-4 (not eligible for reenlistment without prior approval of the Chief of Naval Personnel) be upgraded to RE-1 (eligible for reenlistment). of your naval record pursuant to the “foolish A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 May 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Documentar’y material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03920-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03922-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of captain he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2000 Captain Selection Board, vice the FY 2001 Captain Selection Board. d. In correspondence attached as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03924-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, Board requesting, in effect, by changing the reenlistment code assigned on 15 March 1993. that his naval record be corrected filed enclosure (1) with this consisting of Mr. Brezna, Mr. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and 2. Additionally, it is clear to the Therefore, a void In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03932-01
You were The Board believed that a record of three consecutive marginal and adverse performance evaluations was sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code, despite the recommendation for retention contained in the last performance evaluation of record. the Board concludes that if a performance evaluation for the period 15 June 1997 until your release from active duty on 6 October 1997 had been available, it would have been adverse. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03933-01
Since recruit training was the first time he was away from home and has not suffered from depression since, the specialty advisor opines that Petitioner is an appropriate candidate for the NROTC program_ Q- Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3E or an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of erroneous entry. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 9 December 1999, to RE-3E. That any material or entries...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03940-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 3940-00 12 October 2000 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03943-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. discharge authority, the recommendation for approved and on 7 January 1999 you received honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03943-99
Though Petitioner's BCNR case file does not establish Petitioner's actual notice of the current version of DOD Directive 1010.4, the fact Petitioner's rehabilitative potential was affirmatively considered and assessed prior to his discharge makes resolution of this issue unnecessary. Application to Petitioner's case. drug use was evidenced by a urinalysis for methamphetamine and Petitioner's further drug use following a second positive urinalysis in Petitioner's history of drug use and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03945-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RR-4 reenlistment code assigned on 6 April 1998. Petitioner's 214 is in error because he was never diagnosed with a personality disorder and was not processed for separation for that reason. This code will alert The Board further concludes that this Report of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03947-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, while the administrative discharge recommendation was being processed, you began another series of unauthorized absences. During the period 25 April to 1 July 1980 you were an unauthorized absentee on three occasions totaling about 35 days.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03954-00
On 15 January 1992 you were convicted by a special The Board was unable to obtain your service record and conducted its review based on the decisional document prepared by the Naval Discharge Review Board. The NDRB document shows The DD Form 214 shows The bad conduct In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, honorable service and your contention, in effect, that the punishment was too severe and you should have been allowed to retire. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03954-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (SBP) Termination Request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03956-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03963-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he signed his reserves appointment on 18 July 2000. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Lightle, and McPartlin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03964-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 3964-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. l~iinel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive A three-member session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03967-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. performance evaluation for the period 29 June to 15 September 2000, you were not recommended for promotion or retention in the You received the general discharge on 15 September 2000. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03968-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’s naval record In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03969-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Taylor, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03972-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03973-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lg (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 12 July 1999. (5), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page llg (“Adarministrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03974-01
yocr request to change the characterization of As you your You allege that the Department of Defense (DD) Form 214 ( Discharge from Active Duty ”) you were given to sign did not reflect the RE-4 code; and that the nurses and doctors at the Naval Hospital Great Lakes mental health clinic where you were treated did not have an explanation of why you were there. “Certificate of Release or A three-member panel of the Board ’ for Correction of session, considered your application on 3 1 May...