DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No:
9 August 2001
3943-00
Your allegations of error and
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1 August 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve for
eight years on 30 June 1997 at age 19.
enlistment contract required you to participate in 48 drills and
perform 14 days of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) each year.
You reported for initial ACDUTRA on 12 January 1998.
On 27 June
1998 you were released from active duty and assigned to a Marine
Corps Reserve Unit.
On 23 November 1998 the commanding officer recommended that you
be separated with an other than honorable discharge by
unsatisfactory participation due to failure to attend any
regularly scheduled drills after July 1998.
recommendation, YOU elected to waive
case to an administrative discharge board.
discharge authority, the recommendation for
approved and on 7 January 1999 you received
honorable discharge.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
reas6n of
When informed of the
your right to present your
After review by the
separation was
an other than
In this regard, your
‘
such as your youth and immaturity
However, the Board concluded that these
and you have submitted no
This failure was sufficient to warrant
Accordingly, your application
The names and votes of the members of the panel
potentially mitigating factors,
and personal problems.
factors were not sufficient to warrant your reinstatement.The
Board noted the record reflects that you failed to attend
scheduled drills over a period of time,
evidence to the contrary.
an other than honorable discharge.
has been denied.
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
,Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
You are entitled to have the
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03598-01
After careful and conscientious'consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 8 March 2000 the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of unsatisfactory participation due to failure to attend regularly When scheduled drills in October, November, and December 1999. informed of the recommendation, you elected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05122-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 20 March 1998 you were discharged with an other than honorable At that time you were assigned a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03063-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2001. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05852-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. In this regard, your enlistment You On 30 November When informed of the recommendation, you elected to You received a general discharge from At that time you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04759-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. contract required...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00941-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 Augugt 2008. On 6 March 1978 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfadtory participation due to your failure to attend regularly scheduled drills. : Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is existence of probable on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00414-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2008. On 19 February 1986 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation due to your failure to attend regularly scheduled drills. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03039-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2008. On 21 August 1985 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated from the USMCR with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation due to your failure to attend regularly scheduled drills. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02027-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 11 July 1980. After review by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05086-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2010. Under the terms of your enlistment contract, you were required to participate in 48 drills and perform 14 days of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) each year. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.