Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03849-01
Original file (03849-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

ELP
Docket No. 3849-01
12 October 2001

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code,

Section 1552.

considered your application on
Your allegations of error and injustice were

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records,
sitting in executive session,
11 October 2001.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application,
together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record,
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

the Board found that the evidence submitted was

The Board found that you were inducted into the Marine Corps on
21 January 1952 for two years at age 19.
that you were advanced to PFC (E-3) and served for six months
without incident.
1952 to September 1953 you received two nonjudicial punishments
(NJP) and were convicted by a special court-martial. Your
offenses consisted of three periods of unauthorized absence
totaling about 25 days.
incident and received a general discharge on 20 January 1954.

 
you served without further

The record reflects

However,

during the 14 month period from July

Thereafter,

(UA)

Character of service is based, in part, on conduct and
proficiency averages which are computed from marks assigned
during periodic evaluations.
averages were 3.52 and 5.5, respectively.
of 4.0 in conduct was required for a fully honorable character-
ization of service at the time of your discharge.

Your conduct and proficiency

A minimum average mark

the Board carefully weighed

services because of your general discharge.

limited education, low test scores, and the fact that

you provide no evidence as to what veterans' services or

In its review of your application,
all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and
immaturity,
it has been more than 47 years since you were discharged.
Board noted you contention to the effect that you have been
denied veterans'
However,
benefits you have been denied.
foregoing factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization
of your discharge given your record of two
NJPs, a special  
martial conviction,
average in conduct.
veterans'
your discharge.
proper and no change is warranted.
has been denied.
will be furnished upon request.

The fact you may have been denied certain
services does not provide a valid basis 'for upgrading

The names and votes of the members of the panel

The Board concluded that the discharge was

and your failure to achieve the required

The

The Board concluded that the

 

court-

Accordingly, your  

applicaticn

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently,
record,
existence of probable material error or injustice.

the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the

In this regard,

when applying for a correction of an official naval

it is important to keep in mind that a

You are entitled to have

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06258-00

    Original file (06258-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your contentions were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three a deck court and a summary court-martial, and failure to received the require average in conduct. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05541-01

    Original file (05541-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You served without further incident and received a general discharge upon the expiration of your enlistment on 15 September 1953. of 4.0 in conduct was required for a fully honorable characteri- zation of service at the time of your discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06307-01

    Original file (06307-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of two conviction, and your failure to achieve the required average in conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07620-02

    Original file (07620-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02014-01

    Original file (02014-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. average marks of 4.0...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01439-01

    Original file (01439-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. court- martial (SPCM) of disobedience and a day of unauthorized absence (UA) month, a $50 forfeiture of pay, - You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06282-00

    Original file (06282-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You continued to serve in the Marine Corps and whea you You were honorably discharged on During this period you Individuals discharged for unsuitability received the type of Character of service discharge warranted by the service record. The Board also noted your In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity, subsequent honorable service in Vietnam in which you were twice wounded in combat, and your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11955-10

    Original file (11955-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval - Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00128-01

    Original file (00128-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted the earnings statement you submit to support your contention that you have matured over the years since your discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808841

    Original file (NC9808841.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Since you were convicted by two special courts-martial, an honorable discharge was not authorized.