DEPARTNIENT OF
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
THIE NAVY
NlrVAL RECORD
S
i NAVY ANNE
X
WASHIN
;TON DC 20373-510
0
BJG
Docket No: 3919-01
1 June 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested that your
reenlistment code of RE-4 (not eligible for reenlistment without prior approval of the Chief
of Naval Personnel) be upgraded to RE-1 (eligible for reenlistment). You asserted that you
were having relationship problems with your fiancee ’; that you left the Navy and came
home; that you never gave your military career a chance; and that you made a
im-mature mistake” when you chose to get out of the Navy.
of your naval record pursuant to the
“foolish
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 3 May 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
Documentar’y material considered by the Board consisted of your
proceedings of this Board.
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Your allegations of error and injustice
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board found that your record reflects that you were
discharged by reason of a personality disorder, and
risk of harm to yourself or others.
RE-4 was properly assigned.
names and votes of the members of the
Accordingly, they found that your reenlistment code of
yl3ur application has been denied. The
.furnished upon request.
In view of the above,
p.%nel will be
th;lt you were diagnosed as having been a
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind
th,it a presumption of regularity attaches to
all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sin’cerely ,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02482-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your e.rror and application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance ldith administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this considereld by the Board consisted of Board. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is required by regulatory guidance and must The Board thus separated by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01894-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. prior to submitting this request you conferred with a qualified military lawyer at which time you were advised of your rights and warned of the probabl adverse...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00980-01
980-01 14 June 2001 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. applicat:.on for correction of your A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session,, considered your application on 12 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Iof an RE-4 reenlistment code Regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06836-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings -of this Board. in the Marine Corps without prior approval of the Commandant of You were I the Marine Corps. composite score 0 1993 promotion 1992 in his PM0 promotion to co not have the re service record indicates that he had a or the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 03853-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03953-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Accordingly, your application has been denied.The Board did not consider whether the reason for your separation should be changed because you did not request such action and have no exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06867-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 12 March 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Your allegations of error and your naval record, considered your After careful and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00151-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session considered your application on 6 June injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04755-01
It is noted that CMC has corrected your reenlistment code to RE-3C. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05214-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered you r application on 5 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your application was accepted as a request for a better reenlistment code since the Board has no authority to waive a reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...