Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03974-01
Original file (03974-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF

THEi NAVY
CORFlECTlON  OF NAVAL RECORD

 

BOARD FOR

 

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINC,TON  DC 20370-510

0

S

BJG
Docket No: 3974-01
31 May 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction cf your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested that your
reenlistment code of RE-4 (not eligible for reenlistment without prior approval of the Chief
of Naval Personnel) be upgraded, and that
received an uncharacterized discharge,
 
discharge was not considered.

  your discharge be changed to honorable.
yocr request to change the characterization of

  As you
  your

You allege that the Department of Defense (DD) Form 214 (
Discharge from Active Duty ”) you were given to sign did not reflect the RE-4 code; and that
the nurses and doctors at the Naval Hospital Great Lakes mental health clinic where you
were treated did not have an explanation of why you were there. You submitted an undated
statement from a staff psychiatrist at Naval Hospital Roosevelt Roads indicating that you had
m8emorandum dated 1 November 1999
a brief psychotic episode which was resolved; and a
from a civilian doctor indicating  “no 

diag[nosis]” of any mental health problem.

“Certificate of Release or

 

A three-member panel of the Board ’ for Correction of  
session, considered  your application on 3 1 May 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
regul,ations and procedures applicable to the
were reviewed in accordance with administrative  
proceedings of this Board. Documentary naterial considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material subrnitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and  

Naval Records, sitting in executive

policie,;.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.  In this connection, the Board found   your naval record shows that you entered
active duty on 11 August 1999; that you were admitted to the Naval Hospital Great Lakes
mental health clinic on 7 September 1999 for safety, evaluation and disposition because you
other- in English; that on the same date,
had stated you had seen two birds talking to each
Navy doctor diagnosed you with a  
“psychlXic disorder, not otherwise specified (probable

 

 a

that you were discharged on 7 October   1999 by reason of  “erroneous entry

schizophrenia)“;
(other)“; that you had an entry level
within 180 days of your entry on active duty; and that you received the RE-4 code
appropriate for an ELS.

separ,ation  (ELS), meaning that you were discharged

 

The Board found that the DD Form 2 14 on file in your record does reflect the RE-4 code;
that you acknowledge having been aware of it since January 2000; and that your record
shows that on 17 September 1999, you initialed a waiver of your right to make a statement
concerning your separation.
the Board that your diagnosis on 7 September 1999   wa.s  incorrect.

Finally, the physician statements you provided did not persuade

In view of the above, your application  
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

ha:, been denied. The names and votes of the

 

ycur case are  

:,uch that favorable action cannot be
It is regretted that the circumstances of
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind  
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

th2.t a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600238

    Original file (ND0600238.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge bechanged to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “ Medical discharge. However since he made a very serious suicide attempt, it may not be the best interest for him and Navy to continue in the Navy.990922: Medical entry: Recruit Evaluation Unit, Branch Clinic 1017, Naval Hospital, Great Lakes, IL, J_ E_ D_, Ph.D., Clinical Psychologist/Staff: SR comes to REU as a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00749

    Original file (ND02-00749.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 010829 with an uncharacterized service (entry level separation) for defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1: An Entry Level Separation (ELS) is not a dishonorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00651

    Original file (ND00-00651.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is the reason I am requesting that the Review Board change my RE code to reflect a General Discharge under Honorable Conditions, so that I may Re-enlist in the U.S. Navy. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 950317 with an Entry Level Separation (uncharacterized) by reason of defective enlistment due to Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards (A). In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that although the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600283

    Original file (ND0600283.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The patient denied any auditory or visual hallucinations, denied delusions, ideas of reference, or any other psychotic symptoms. No indication of appeal in the record.040618: Psychiatric evaluation at Naval Hospital, Great Lakes, Illinois, by P. K_, MD: Attention is directed to a copy of Doctor N_ psychiatric examination dated 7 April 2004 at which time he was diagnosed with depressive disorder, not otherwise specified, and borderline personality disorder. He stated he did not like the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501171

    Original file (ND0501171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Medical Discharge.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. AXIS I: Major depression, recurrent 296.30 EPTE Relationship Problem NOS, V62.81 Bereavement, V62.82 AXIS II: 301.83 Borderline Personality Disorder AXIS III: Has fibroid problems AXIS V: Current Global Assessment of Functioning:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600300

    Original file (ND0600300.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application and/or attached document/letter: “I was recently denied a change in my military record for my DD 214 in reference to my RE code. I can only go part time, due to work and family. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600158

    Original file (ND0600158.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Past Psychiatric History: Patient reports although this is the first time he has seen a psychiatrist, he was feeling depressed and was asked to see Dr. B_ in the Navy, who told him he had depression and did not put him on any meds. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00433

    Original file (ND02-00433.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SA, USN Docket No. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged, in absentia, on 991117 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to being absent without leave - 30 days or more (A). While in the service, the Applicant was diagnosed by competent medical authority and provided with the appropriate treatment.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501203

    Original file (ND0501203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-01203 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050713. I feel that “no waiver for psych “ had a direct impact on the reason for my Discharge as Erroneous Enlistment. SR is suitable to report to Separations Division.021213: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment as evidenced by a borderline personality disorder.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601182

    Original file (ND0601182.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20040506: Recruit Evaluation Unit, Naval Hospital Great Lakes. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20040625Reason for Discharge due to: Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20040625Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Commanding Officer...