Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03964-01
Original file (03964-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 3964-01
30 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the  

IJnited States Code, section  

1552.

l~iinel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive

A three-member 
session, considered your application on 30 October 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, togetl- er with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by  
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 1 1 of 26 September 2001, a copy of which is

Your allegations of error and injustice

8:onscientious  consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
After careful and  
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory 
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

opinilzm. Accordingly, your application has been denied.

  The names and votes of

to have the Board reconsider its decision  

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled  
natter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
evidence or other  
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

upon submission of new and material

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000

Y

1430
Ser 811
26 Sep 01

MEMORANDUM 

F3R EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters  

(PERS-OOXCB)

Subj:

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

IN THE CASE OF

Ref:

(a) BUPERSINST 1430.163

Encl:

(1) 

BCNR  file 

#03964-01

Based on policy and guidelines established in reference

1.
(a), enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

Petty Officer

paygrade  E-4.

There are

2.
rate upon entry to Naval Service to  
no provisions to change his enlistment contract and advance
him to 
this petition.

No relief can be recommended regarding

was administratively reduced in

paygrade  E-5.

By direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04627-01

    Original file (04627-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 200 1. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07239-01

    Original file (07239-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 81 attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06744-01

    Original file (06744-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 11 of 7 December 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01089-01

    Original file (01089-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03177-06

    Original file (03177-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandums 1430 Ser 48llE9/375, 13 June 2006 and 11 December 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), enclosure (1) is returned with the following...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01187-01

    Original file (01187-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01398-01

    Original file (01398-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01153-01

    Original file (01153-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04747-01

    Original file (04747-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01893-01

    Original file (01893-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.