DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTI
a;r,
BOARD FOR
Tlk’ NAVY
OF NAVAL
RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX:
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BJG
Docket No: 598-01
13 July 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested that your
reenlistment code of RE-4 (not eligible for reenlistment without prior approval of the Chief
of Naval Personnel) be upgraded to RE-3 (eligible for reenlistment except for disqualifying
factor). You objected that you were given the RE-4 code for a mental condition.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board found your naval record shows that you entered
2ooO by reason of
active duty on 7 July 2000; that you were discharged on 8 November
“convenience of the government
adjustment disorder with depressed mood and suicidal thoughts with method, and depressive
(ELS), meaning that
disorder not otherwise specified; that you had an entry level separation
you were discharged within 180 days of your entry on active duty; and that you received the
RE-4 code appropriate for an ELS. In view of the above, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
- mental_ conditions ”; that you were diagnosed with
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
cc&&ion of an official naval record, the
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00472-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06622-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02644-03
approved your separation and on 19 December 2001, you were discharged with an entry-level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed depressive and personality disorders. depressive and personality disorders, would have posed a threat to yourself and others, the Board Given the severity of the diagnosed and since your retention concluded that the RE-4 reenlistment code was properly and Accordingly, your request has been appropriately assigned. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03974-01
yocr request to change the characterization of As you your You allege that the Department of Defense (DD) Form 214 ( Discharge from Active Duty ”) you were given to sign did not reflect the RE-4 code; and that the nurses and doctors at the Naval Hospital Great Lakes mental health clinic where you were treated did not have an explanation of why you were there. “Certificate of Release or A three-member panel of the Board ’ for Correction of session, considered your application on 3 1 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05886-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2001. Further, they questioned your credibility, in view of your assertion that you faked sleepwalking. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01087-01
material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in considered your application on Documentary regulations and policies. You were so discharged on 27 November 1995 and assigned and waived the right to Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07334-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that a record, which included a disciplinary action and adverse performance evaluations was sufficient to support the assignment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07151-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. than others separated for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03279-01
Concerning your abuse of alcohol you stated that It was also noted that you had previously been diagnosed The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 May 2000 at age 22. Based on the foregoing record, administrative separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment, a and alcohol abuse rehabilitation designated mental condition, Subsequently, the separation authority directed an failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-00
6039-00 9 February 2001 -_ Dear- This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United Board for Correction of Navy A three-member panel for the Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that the Navy's diagnosis of a...