Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00574-01
Original file (00574-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

                                2 NAVY ANNEX

                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

                                                     ELP
                                                     Docket No. 574-01
                                                     16 May 2001









  Dear

  This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
  record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section
  1552.

  A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting
  in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2001. Your
  allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
  administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
  this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
  application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
  naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

  After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
  Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the
  existence of probable material error or injustice.

  The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 27 October 1998 for four years
  at age 17. The record reflects that on 30 October 1998 you were admitted
  to a naval hospital after you attempted suicide by superficially
  lacerating your wrists. The hospital treatment summary noted that two
  weeks prior to your enlistment, you learned that your girlfriend was
  pregnant. In an effort to gain attention and be discharged, you inflicted
  a number of superficial cuts on both wrists. You were found sitting on the
  floor of a restroom weeping, and were then brought to the emergency room
  for a psychiatric admission. You were diagnosed with an adjustment
  disorder with depressed mood and dependent traits. You were considered to
  be a potential risk for further harm to yourself if retained, and an entry
  level separation was recommended.

  On 4 November 1998 you were notified that administrative separation was
  being considered by reason of convenience of the
government as evidenced by an adjustment disorder. You were advised of your
procedural rights, declined to consult with legal counsel or submit a
statement in own behalf, and waived the right to have your case reviewed by
the general court—martial convening authority. On 5 November1998 the
discharge authority directed an uncharacterized entry level separation by
reason of erroneous entry. You were so discharged on 10 November 1998 and
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to
individuals discharged by reason of erroneous entry. The Board noted your
contentions to the effect that prior to reporting to recruit training, you
learned of your girlfriend’s pregnancy and it impacted on your self-
confidence. You stated you were never told what to expect in recruit
training, but after three days you knew it was not for you. However, you
now regret the actions which led to your discharge. The Navy views with
grave concern those who make suicidal gestures. The Board noted the
aggravating factor that there is no guarantee that you would not act in the
same manner if faced with a similar situation or if the demands of military
service became too unpleasant. The Board concluded you were a potential
risk for harm to yourself or others if retained, the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code was proper and no change is warranted. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable
action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its
decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep
in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
material error or injustice.

                                        Sincerely,




                                        W.    DEAN PFEIFFER
                                        Executive Director








                                      2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00980-01

    Original file (00980-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    980-01 14 June 2001 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. applicat:.on for correction of your A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session,, considered your application on 12 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Iof an RE-4 reenlistment code Regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-00

    Original file (06039-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6039-00 9 February 2001 -_ Dear- This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United Board for Correction of Navy A three-member panel for the Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that the Navy's diagnosis of a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00430-02

    Original file (00430-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You claimed recurrent suicidal ideation since arriving at recruit training and stabbed yourself because "Nobody would listen to me...now they are listening."

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07178-08

    Original file (07178-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Therefore, given your pre-service suicidal ideation and threat to kill yourself while at recruit training, and since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01863-01

    Original file (01863-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were so discharged on 15 May 2000 and assigned and waived the right to Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. Since you have been treated no differently than others discharged under similar...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08875-07

    Original file (08875-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00151-01

    Original file (00151-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session considered your application on 6 June injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02732-01

    Original file (02732-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You were advised of your procedural rights, The discharge The Board Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of erroneous entry. Your doctor provides no evidence of his qualifi- cations or a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation to support his The Board noted contention or to refute the Navy's diagnosis. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00532-02

    Original file (00532-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01885-01

    Original file (01885-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    15 December 1998 and assigned an RE-3P reenlistment code. You were honorably discharged on Incident to your The Board also noted your contentions that the medical incident was a transient The Board noted the letters of Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3P or RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are discharged by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...