ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015507
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. By the unsatisfactory performance, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable characterization of service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015577
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015611
Applicant Name: ????? On 15 April 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015630
Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 27 July 2011. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015677
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149 in lieu of a DD Form 293 dated 26 November 2010, DA Form 137-2 dated 4 October 2010, self authored statement dated 26 June 2011.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015755
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015756
Applicant Name: ????? On 22 October 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015859
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The counsel for the applicant states, in effect, that the applicants unit failed to comply with administrative regulations and procedures, and discharged the applicant without a hearing, despite a pending request for conditional waiver as documented by the attached e-mails, and that it amounts to violation of the Soldiers due process rights. The analyst noted that an administrative separation board is a right and required...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015886
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015978
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an honorable discharge. If the applicant did not have a personality disorder in 2005, he did not have a personality disorder in 2006. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority under Provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, with a corresponding separation (SPD) code of JFF. Other: The separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016077
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U....
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016083
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant contends that he was released from the military, because his son burnt his hand, and after having surgery, he lossened the bandages. On 20 September 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016086
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 September 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL (020116-020128), which he received a Field Grade Article 15, disobeyed a noncommissioned officer (020107), counseled on several occasions for instances of disciplinary infractions, such...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016090
Applicant Name: ????? On 16 July 2009, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. However, in review of the applicant's entire service record, the analyst found that this medical condition did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016102
Applicant Name: ????? Since my waiver was approved and I was able to join the ARMY I believe that I should not have an Other than Honorable discharge on my record. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016105
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016121
Applicant Name: ????? He later changed his recommendation to separate the applicant with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. On 11 July 2006, an Administrative Separation Board determined that the applicant did commit a serious offense of using illegal drugs and recommended that the applicant be discharged with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016125
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder ?????
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016150
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NA Discharge Received: Date: 051117 Chapter: 4 AR: 635-200 Reason: Completion of Required Active Service RE: SPD: MBK Unit/Location: Company D, 795TH Military Police Battalion, T/TC, Fort Leonard Wood, MO Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of MBK (i.e., completion...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016163
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states in effect that he is applying for a state job as a prison guard. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of a pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016229
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 November 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct; in that he sexually harassed a female PFC between (100501-100817) and wrongfully endeavored to impede an official investigation, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 November 2010, the applicant consulted with legal...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016273
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 June 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Further, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016326
On 13 July 2006, the unit commander declared the applicant an unsatisfactory participant and recommended that he be processed for separation (discharged) from the US Army Reserve under the provisions of AR 135-178. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016328
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 January 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL (090624-090903), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016330
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016426
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090310 Discharge Received: Date: 090520 Chapter: 3-13 AR: 600-8-24 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: DFS Unit/Location: HHC, USAREUR/7th Army, Germany Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. On 23 April 2009, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016427
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 8 August 2011, 8 newspaper articles and pictures with vrious dates.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016432
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used methamphetamine and possessed syringes; in addition, he had several failure to repairs. On 23 May 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016468
Applicant Name: ????? Years 10 weeks Current ENL Service: 0 Yrs, 3 Mos, 16 Days ????? The analyst noted the applicant's issue that she is requesting a discharge upgrade and reenlistment code change so that she can reenter the service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016471
Applicant Name: ????? Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. There is no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016497
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 February 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failing to adapt to military life, lack of motivation, and demonstrated unwillingness to follow and live by the Army values, with an uncharacterized discharge. The regulation requires an uncharacterized discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016524
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 27 July 2011, self authored statement dated 17 June 2011, DD Form 214 for a period of service ending 9 March 2007 with an honorable characterization of service, copy of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016533
Applicant Name: ????? On 2 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Pattern of Misconduct", the separation code is "JKA", and the reentry code is "RE 3".
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016544
Applicant Name: ????? On 6 December 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016586
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016649
Applicant Name: ????? On 1 September 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived her right to an administrative separation board, contingent upon her receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than an honorable discharge and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. The Board will consider any aggravating factors and in their absence, will change the narrative reason for the discharge to Secretarial Authority.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016669
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct (serious offense), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016670
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 December 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, for continuously failing to be at his appointed place of duty with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 16 December 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016784
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 090719 Chapter: 13 AR: 135-178 Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016786
Applicant Name: ????? The regulation requires an uncharacterized discharge for separation under this Chapter. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016826
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Serious Offense)", and the separation code is "JKQ."
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016858
On 29 July 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 12 July 2010 The applicant again consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Further, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016860
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c (2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016917
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016934
Applicant Name: ????? Issue 5: The characterization of service was inequitable when compared to the reasons for which other Soldiers received under other than honorable conditions discharges at the time. The applicant was properly advised by legal counsel of the basis for his contemplated trial by court-martial and the maximum permissible punishment authorized under the Uniform Code of Military Justice; of the possible effects of an other than honorable conditions discharge if his request...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016944
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 October 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that she wrongfully used marijuana between (080328-080428) and AWOL (080211-080212) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority approved the recommendation for vacation of the suspended...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016972
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Further, the the analyst acknowledges the applicants in-service accomplishments and considered the quality of his service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review, his prior successful enlistment, and his combat deployments.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110017168
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(1) by reason of misconduct (serious offense), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110017309
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 January 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3c, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct (marriage or attempted marriage) with an honorable discharge. The Board will consider any aggravating factors and in their absence, will change the narrative reason for the discharge to Secretarial Authority.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110017623
The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. However, if the applicant desires documented periods of service, the creation of discharge certificates is not within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.