ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013269
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, (serious offense) with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013271
Applicant Name: ????? On 5 February 2003, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge, even though the applicant was not entitled to an administrative separation board. On 10 February 2003, the separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013358
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. However, the evidence of record contains several counseling statements that indicate the applicant went awol and upon his returned he was counseled. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013484
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149 in lieu of a DD Form 293 dated 22 June 2011.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013575
Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, the DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. However, the analyst is unable to determine whether these contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013603
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 December 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he failed to be at his appointed place of duty on several occasions and counseled for dishonorably failing to pay his just debts, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 13 December 2002, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013616
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation from the Army with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 15 September 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013617
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 May 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; for assault, drunk driving, failing to obey a lawful order, wrongfully using ecstasy and d-methamphetamine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 16 May 2001, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013618
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 26 June 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he assaulted a SGT, a noncommissioned officer (100224), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 11 July 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013619
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander's reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013634
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 7 March 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013838
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013871
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Board Action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013911
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended that the applicant be retained on active duty. Eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013936
Applicant Name: ????? On 21 February 2003, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014095
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 041014 Discharge Received: Date: 041122 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: 263rd Maintenance Company, 180th Transportation Battalion, 64th Corps Support Group, APO, AE Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): The unit commander's memorandum recommending the applicant's separation from the Army indicates he received a Summarized Article 15 for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014233
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 100714 Chapter: 14-12c (2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: ????? On 30 June 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014235
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "Im trying to upgrate my discharge into an Honorable Discharge because the status of my discharge at the moment is under honorable conditions. On 12 April 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, the board determined that the reason for discharge was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014242
Applicant Name: ????? Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 9 May 2011.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014244
Soldiers Overall Record Age at current enlistment: 25 Current ENL Date: 970530 Current ENL Term: 4 Years The applicant extended his period of enlistment for 6 months on (980902) giving him a new ETS date of: (011129). On 24 August 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014256
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 070411 Discharge Received: Date: 070502 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Troop A, 2nd Battalion, 6th Cavalry, Germany Time Lost: AWOL x 1 (050223-070305) for 743 days. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014419
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014452
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014457
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 December 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he received a Field Grade Article 15 for having a negligent discharge with an M240B Semi-Automatic Weapon; and on the 4 December 2006, he received a Field Grade Article 15 for being derelict in the performance of his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014476
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c (2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c (2) by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014568
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 8 July 2011, License from the State of North Carolina giving the applicant all the rights and privileges for EMT-Basic which expires 31 January 2014.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014647
On 23 September 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 3 October 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014650
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c (2) by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014804
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014817
Applicant Name: ????? On 19 January 2007, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014931
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 November 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he assaulted a noncommissioned officer (080724), failed to report for duty (081009), and received nonjudicial punishment for several acts of misconduct of failing to report to duty on time. The intermediate commander...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014938
Applicant Name: ????? On 6 January 2004, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 9 March 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015036
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 November 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015037
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The record indicates that on 27 July 2004, Department of the Army, Headquarters, US Army Reserve Command, Fort McPherson, GA, issued Orders 04-209-00031, which discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, with an effective date of: 27 August 2004, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015078
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 970820 Chapter: 9 AR: 635-200 Reason: Drug Rehabilitation Failure RE: SPD: JPC Unit/Location: HQ & HQ Company, 1st Battalion, 16th Infantry Regiment, Fort Riley, KS Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015211
Applicant Name: ????? On 21 January 2011, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015213
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015226
Applicant Name: ????? On 15 April 1998, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 28 August 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015229
Applicant Name: ????? On 21 September 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, drug abuse with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015232
Applicant Name: ????? On 29 September 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and indicated on his election of rights form that he would be submitting a statement. On 10 November 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015236
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015248
On 30 November 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015255
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he was not granted leave for a death in the family, which resulted in psychological distress. On 23 February 2009, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015262
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 September 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for lack of motivation, refusal to restart and train and failed to live up to the Army Values and adapt to the Army life, with an uncharacterized discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015373
He feels he deserves an Honorable discharge, because the military gave him a reason to believe in himself as a man, as a son, as father, and as a Soldier. He expresses his appreciation to the Board for taking the time in reviewing his application for an upgrade. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015408
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army National Guard Regulation 600-200 sets forth the basic authority for the Army National Guard and establishes the separation of enlisted personnel. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because his quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015469
Applicant Name: ????? On 26 February 2009, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) reviewed the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015472
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions . The analyst noted the applicant's issue...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015487
On 14 August 2003, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action; and indicated if discharged, recommend approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge and he further recommended that the discharge action be suspended for 6 months and to be automatically remitted if not sooner vacated. On 30 December 2003, the separation authority vacated the suspension of the approved separation; waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015496
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 March 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failing to maintain the standards required of a Soldier in basic combat training; he missed several training events and failing to have the motivation to complete them. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as...