ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110017735
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 070123 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company B, 1st Battalion, 15th Infantry, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division, Fort Benning, GA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. On 21 December 2006, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110017785
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: evidence of record shows that on 30 October 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he received a Company Grade Article 15 for disrespecting a commissioned officer and a noncommissioned officer, making a false official statement, and wrongfully appropriated personal property, counseled for being...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110017910
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "The discharge is improper because my behavior while assigned to the WTU, Ft. Benning was uncharacteristic due to numerous medications that altered my mood and caused severe drowsiness. In reviewing this case the Board found the character of service is too harsh based on the applicant's length, quality of his service, and combat service and voted to retain the character of service as general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110017967
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he would like to rejoin the Army. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018072
Soldiers Overall Record Age at current enlistment: 24 Current ENL Date: 041110 Current ENL Term: 04 Years The applicant's record is missing any documents that would have extended his enlistment, however, the Enlisted Record Brief found in the record makes reference to the applicant having an ETS dated of (110709). On 31 May 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018170
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-200, provides that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018181
Applicant Name: ????? After a thorough review of the applicants records and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Official: BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018190
On 27 January 2011, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 3 August 2011. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018191
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he wants to pursue a career in law enforcement and knows that the conditions and situation which led to his discharge were a direct result of his own actions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Furthermore, notwithstanding the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018233
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, DD Form 149, Physical Profile, dated 18 November 2005, Entrance Physical Standards Board (BPSBD) Proceedings, dated 18 November 2005, and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018234
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record indicates that on 3 September 2009, the unit commander in consultation with the Clinical Director/Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) declared the applicant a rehabilitation failure. On 2 December 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, by reason of drug rehabilitation/ASAP failure, with a general, under honorable conditions discharges. On 9 December 2009, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018253
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214, indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. Army Regulation 635-200, provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018254
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 March 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for violating a lawful order on divers occasions (091111-091209); violating a lawful general regulation on divers occasions (091201-100110); making a false official statement (100105); and receiving a Company Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018444
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The board recommended separation from the Army with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018462
Applicant Name: ????? The complete separation packet (i.e., the intermediate commander's recommendation for approval of the separation action; the administrative board proceedings and the separation approving authority documents is not part of the available record and the the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of misconduct, with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018578
Applicant Name: ????? He states he was previously discharged with honorable conditions for the periods 990810 to 020809 and 030115 to 030615. On 3 April 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018661
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 30 April 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018663
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018667
The commander then advised him to take the under honorable discharge and to returnthe commander told him that he had to confess to smoking spice exactly as they said he did. On 13 January 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018672
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 April 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failing two consecutive Army Physical Fitness Tests (APFTs), with a fully honorable discharge. On 27 April 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated, with a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018706
It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he is requesting block 24, on his DD Form 214 "characterization of service" to be changed to honorable and further states that he is married and has a baby on the way and it has been very difficult for him to find a job because of his discharge. Yes...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018708
Applicant Name: ????? Despite these issues, I served to the best of my ability. This single incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018759
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 11 September 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018760
Applicant Name: ????? On 18 May 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018761
Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, he feels he was not properly advised by the Legal Services at Fort Leavenworth, particularly; regarding the two Article 15s executed on the same day. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018776
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 August 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018781
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and determined that the the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018789
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 2 September 2011, self authored statement.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018793
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018856
Applicant Name: ????? After a thorough review of the applicants records and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018938
Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst recommends the applicants request for an upgrade of his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018977
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states; "I am currently living overseas and have been since 7 May 2010, on my husbands PCS orders. After my last conversation in June 2011, he advised me since I already received my discharge paperwork (Under Honorable Discharge (General) effective 7 February 2011 dated for 31 January 2011 that I should go before the review board because there is nothing the counsel of my case can do. However, the applicant was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018996
Applicant Name: ????? On 27 April 2010, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018999
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 October 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 1-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he disobeyed a direct order from a SSG in which he received a Company Grade Article 15 on (100501); failed to report to his appointed place of duty x 5 (100806), (100815), (100818), (100822), (100828), disobeyed a direct...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019003
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 15 March 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, for assaulting Ms. AKB with a baseball bat and for leaving his place of duty without proper authorization, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019009
Applicant Name: ????? If my command had treated me more as a "troubled" Soldier and less as a "Problem" Soldier I would not have gotten to GUHC. On 3 August 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019012
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019020
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues, and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019104
Facts and Circumstances: The record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the applicants signature. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019188
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 June 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for violating unit policy by consuming alcoholic beverages under the legal age two (2) times, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 July 2011, the separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019306
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 November 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconductfor receiving a CG Article 15 for making a false official statement (100917); a supplementary Article 15 for communicating a threat (101019); and for receiving numerous counselings for misconduct that was prejudicial to good order and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019308
Applicant Name: ????? With a higher education, I hope to be able to continue to assist military service members and their families. On 23 August 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019309
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 020730 Chapter: 9 AR: 635-200 Reason: Drug Rehabilitation Failure RE: SPD: JPC Unit/Location: B Co, Beaumont AMC, Fort Bliss, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 020403, Wrongful use of marijuana between (020119 and 020219), reduction to E4; forfeiture of $876.00 pay per month for one month; extra duty for 45 days; and restriction for 45 days, (FG). His DD Form 214 indicates he...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019310
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090520 Discharge Received: Date: 090629 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company M, 244th Quartermaster Battalion, Fort Lee, VA Time Lost: AWOL x 1 (090201-090502) for 92 days; the applicant surrendered to the military authorities at Fort Knox, KY. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019338
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 July 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failing to adapt socially and emotionally to military life, with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019343
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 October 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor wrongfully using marijuana (050701 and 050805); recklessly operating a vehicle while under the influence of marijuana (050701 and 050905); and making a false statement initially denying use of marijuana (050813), with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019426
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 October 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he failed to go to his appointed place of duty on numerous ocassions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 5 November 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019428
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Decision Board Vote: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) X.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019432
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 January 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019436
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.