Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016524
Original file (AR20110016524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/08/08	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that her discharge was inequitable because she did not want to leave the Army and felt that she was being forced out by a seargeant.  Her monthly counselings leading up to April 2004 were good and from April on it seemed like she had gotten on the bad side of the sergeant.  She was counseled by the Command Sergeant Major and expressed her desire to be transferred to another unit, but her unit did not do it.  During her separation the intermediate commander recommended that she not be separated but instead be rehabilitated and transferred to another unit.  She returned to the US Army in 2005 and was subsequently discharged with an honorable discharge.  

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 040816   Chapter: 14-12b       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: HQ & HQ Company, 50th Signal Battalion (Corps) (Forced Entry) (Airborne), Fort Bragg, NC 

Time Lost: AWOL x 1 (030313-030323) for 11 days.  The mode of return is unknown.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 020418    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	2 Yrs, 3  Mos, 18  Days ?????
Total Service:  		2 Yrs, 4  Mos, 29  Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USAR 020307-020417/NA
Highest Grade: NIF		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92G1P Food Service Spec   GT: NIF   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: NIF   Combat: NIF
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant submitted a DD Form 214 for the period of service ending 9 March 2007, with an honorable characterization of service.







VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of a pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  The evidence of record further shows that on 26 July 2004, DA, XVIII Airborne Corps, Fort Bragg, NC, issued Orders 208-0295 discharging the applicant from the Regular Army with an effective date of: 16 August 2004. 
       
       Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKA (i.e., misconduct) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3."   

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.  
       
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to the former Soldier’s discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.  
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, the analyst is unable to determine whether these contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown.  The burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be her responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.
       
       Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 7 March 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 27 July 2011, self authored statement dated 17 June 2011, DD Form 214 for a period of service ending 9 March 2007 with an honorable characterization of service, copy of a memorandum from his intermediate commander recommending disapproval of the separation action and that it be suspended for six months, and the applicant be given a rehabilitative transfer to another unit dated 7 July 2004.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:



EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board



BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????


Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110016524
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014769

    Original file (AR20100014769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of a pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of a pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016056

    Original file (AR20060016056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12b by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The evidence of record further shows that the correspondence between the applicant's chain of command recommends the applicant for an administrative discharge but does not specify the type of characterization of the discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011064

    Original file (AR20110011064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 030226 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: 642nd Engineer Company, Fort Drum, NY Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120000032

    Original file (AR20120000032.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 March 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for, numerous failures to report for duty (990121, 990125) and AWOL (981110-981118), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 5 April 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009997

    Original file (AR20090009997.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, in review of the applicant’s entire...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010084

    Original file (AR20120010084.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018255

    Original file (AR20090018255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 March 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for receiving two Articles 15 and several negative counseling statements, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 27 March 2002, the applicant waived the opportunity to consult with legal counsel, and was advised of the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010348

    Original file (AR20120010348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 June 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for being AWOL (090319-090322) and for wrongfully sharing a hotel room with a PV1 (090504), for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for unlawfully striking a PV2 with a closed fist...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008574

    Original file (AR20090008574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090021942

    Original file (AR20090021942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of her service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...